Published
Nope, not midlevels in the general sense.
http://www.jvir.org/cgi/content/full/15/3/221?ck=nck
"There are several important differences between PAs and RPAs that result from the fact that the RPA’s training is in radiology and not broadly based in general medicine. RPAs do not have education or licensing to practice medicine and therefore they cannot order tests or procedures, nor can they prescribe medications. There is no regulation of RPAs (outside of licensing as RTs), except in New York, where they are referred to as Specialist Assistants and practice under the Medical Practice Act. RPAs are not recognized providers for medical insurance reimbursement. "
PA schools offered a radiolgy specialty as well as other specialties way back when, but stopped as this could limit scope of practice as a general PA. Many schools are again offering specialties, but as post or continuing education certifications.
Radiology practitioner assistants are only trained for radiology, and most must be registered radtechs (RRT) that go back to school after 5 years of experience.
sunnyjohn
2,450 Posts
I saw this bit on another forum.
What do you think? Are RPA's like NP's, CRNA and PA's- midlevel practioners?
http://www.radiologypa.org/DesktopDefault.aspx
http://www.radiologytoday.net/archive/rt_110804p26.shtml