Published
When coding a pulseless patient in VT or VF do you generally shock them first or use drugs in your practice?
Titles Do Matter, so you'd rather have a brand new RN-BSN graduate with no years of experience other than clinicals and fresh out of school versus an LVN with 5-6 years ED experience, ACLS, PALS, NRP? Titles Do Matter? YEAH RIGHT!I'd take the LVN with my family members no doubt!
I think i'll have to break down and agree with you.....:)
I am sorry that you misunderstood the subject matter discussed in this post. I am also sorry that you misunderstood an earlier post of mine. Maybe you can try to interperet again,"I agree with Biffs25, there is no reason that an RN shouldn't be allowed to gain prehospital certification quickly and economically especially after taking ACLS."
Hope that helps.
There is so much more to being a medic than cardiopulmonary arrest. Thats just a small part of it. And to become prehospital certified after ACLS? What does ACLS have to do with pre-hospital anyways, except for cardiopulmonary arrest?
I dont think most nurses realize that Medics spend very little of their shifts responding to full arrests.
There is so much more to being a medic than cardiopulmonary arrest. Thats just a small part of it. And to become prehospital certified after ACLS? What does ACLS have to do with pre-hospital anyways, except for cardiopulmonary arrest?I dont think most nurses realize that Medics spend very little of their shifts responding to full arrests.
I'm slow, but what exactly are we talking about now?
I believe you might be misrepresenting what Biffs25 was trying to convey. He didnt only say that a nurse should be able to gain "certification" after only an ACLS course. Rather he said:most DOT approved EMT-B courses are at least 144 hours long. Divided into 4 hour classes at three classess per week makes for about a 12 week course. Not to mention the training that EMT-P's recieve to safely control scenes that could and do have multiple trauma pt's while being the only advanced provider present.
Why dont you go to http://ems.creighton.edu/ , or any other provider and take their EMT-B course. Then you can tell us which is harder, the EMT-B written and practical exam, or your puny ACLS cert-
11
Also clinicals..............
Also clinicals..............
I'm an NR-EMTP, I know my stuff. I'm also BLS and BLS Instructor, ACLS and ACLS Instructor, PALS, NRP, CCEMT-P, CRFNm ect, ect,,,What is the point? We were talking about nurses working in I.C.U.'s and having ACLS. Am I missing something or are we on a totally new topic?
I believe you might be misrepresenting what Biffs25 was trying to convey. He didnt only say that a nurse should be able to gain "certification" after only an ACLS course. Rather he said:most DOT approved EMT-B courses are at least 144 hours long. Divided into 4 hour classes at three classess per week makes for about a 12 week course. Not to mention the training that EMT-P's recieve to safely control scenes that could and do have multiple trauma pt's while being the only advanced provider present.
Why dont you go to http://ems.creighton.edu/ , or any other provider and take their EMT-B course. Then you can tell us which is harder, the EMT-B written and practical exam, or your puny ACLS cert-
11
thank you 11, I am definately not condoning any RN taking an ACLS course and being able to call themselves a paramedic. I do, however, feel that it's possible for experienced critical care RN's to become great medics through an abridged paramedic course once they have taken an EMT-Basic class and have pre-hospital experience, speaking from both the EMS and hospital side of the equation.
bobnurse
449 Posts
Tulsa has a 27% survival rate