Published Dec 18, 2008
kikibibi
31 Posts
Please help.... I am papering for final exam on Friday and I am so confused with this questions. Here are the questions. "The patient who is recovering from bilateral knee replacement surgery calls the nurse stations and reports that he has bruises on both sides of his abdomen. The patient's medications include cefazlin (Ancef) IV, hydromorphone (Dilaudid) PCA, and enoxaparin (Lovenox) inj. I was wandering what would be an appropriate nurse response to this patient. I was just thinking that he may have a bleeding disorder or reaction to the antibiotics he is receiving. The other questions I have is if the patient calcium level is 5.6mg/dl does it mean its low? I was looking everywhere and all have a different info. Any help please...
pharmgirl
446 Posts
Could it not also be the lovenox? Lovenox is a low weight heparin that is admin Subq in the abdomen and will generally cause bruising. Just a thought.
Also, with the calcium......yes 5.6 is low if you are measuring with mg/dl. The normal range is 8.9 - 10.1. However, there is another measurement that I've seen in our book that is mmol/l. That normal range is 2.2 - 2.something. We never used or referred to the mmol so I don't know what it is but could be why you are seeing different numbers.
Good Luck
drugstorecowgirl214
104 Posts
I'd say the Lovenox is the cause for the bruising as well. As far as the calcium level could that be ionized level? If I remember correctly ionized calcium is 4.5-5.5, otherwise like the previous poster said a normal range for calcium is 9-11 according to our lab values.
Daytonite, BSN, RN
1 Article; 14,604 Posts
the patient who is recovering from bilateral knee replacement surgery calls the nurse stations and reports that he has bruises on both sides of his abdomen. the patient’s medications include cefazlin (ancef) iv, hydromorphone (dilaudid) pca, and enoxaparin (lovenox) inj. i was wandering what would be an appropriate nurse response to this patient.
if the patient calcium level is 5.6mg/dl does it mean its low?
Thank you soooooo much.........
You are very welcome. I think you knew what was going on, but it was like you were looking at a road that forked off in a bunch of different directions and didn't know which way to go. That's part of the problem with critical thinking. There is so much information that has to be inputted into the problem and when you are new at everything you don't have the experience to know what is important to ferret out. You just needed some direction and hints. These questions are based on things that happen in actual practice.
I did see someone with the carpopedal spasms due to a very low calcium level a day after she had a thyroidectomy. The surgeon had accidentally nicked and removed one of her parathyroid glands and it is how it was discovered. She called us into her room because her hands started spasming at the wrist and she couldn't stop it. It started to get progressively worse. Then her facial muscles started to contort. We ended up giving her IV boluses of calcium with the doctor standing there at her side. Bruised up abdomens are common at the injection sites with people getting Lovenox or Heparin.
Good luck with your final exam.
TessaMae
292 Posts
With the calcium it also depends if the value is total calcium or ionized calcium. Mosby 2009 lab values lists
normal total Ca++ levels are 9-11 mg/dl (4.5-5.5mEq/L)
normal ionized Ca levels are 4.5-5.5 mg/dl (2.25-2.75 meq/L)
-did your question specify if the calcium was total or ionized(free calcium)?
I don't see how you could answer that without knowing which it is. If it is the ionized then your level would be a little high but if it is total then it would be VERY low. Our school is very specific that we never assume and all of our questions have specified which it was.
with the calcium it also depends if the value is total calcium or ionized calcium. mosby 2009 lab values listsnormal total ca++ levels are 9-11 mg/dl (4.5-5.5meq/l)normal ionized ca levels are 4.5-5.5 mg/dl (2.25-2.75 meq/l)-did your question specify if the calcium was total or ionized(free calcium)?i don't see how you could answer that without knowing which it is. if it is the ionized then your level would be a little high but if it is total then it would be very low. our school is very specific that we never assume and all of our questions have specified which it was.
normal total ca++ levels are 9-11 mg/dl (4.5-5.5meq/l)
normal ionized ca levels are 4.5-5.5 mg/dl (2.25-2.75 meq/l)
i don't see how you could answer that without knowing which it is. if it is the ionized then your level would be a little high but if it is total then it would be very low. our school is very specific that we never assume and all of our questions have specified which it was.
the ops question was "if the patient calcium level is 5.6mg/dl does it mean its low?"
as a test question, my hand would shoot up in the air and i would be asking, "do you mean serum calcium or ionized calcium?" you also need to know that ionized calcium is not a commonly done test. serum calcium, on the other hand, is. therefore, i would err on the conservative, go for the worst case scenario and assume this was a serum calcium level and explain my thinking.
i've been a practicing rn for many years. i can tell you that if that level was ignored by a nurse and left for the next nurse to discover, there would be trouble and any nurse who ignored a 5.6 mg/dl without investigating it further would be in deep doo-doo.
the ops question was "if the patient calcium level is 5.6mg/dl does it mean its low?"as a test question, my hand would shoot up in the air and i would be asking, "do you mean serum calcium or ionized calcium?" you also need to know that ionized calcium is not a commonly done test. serum calcium, on the other hand, is. therefore, i would err on the conservative, go for the worst case scenario and assume this was a serum calcium level and explain my thinking.i've been a practicing rn for many years. i can tell you that if that level was ignored by a nurse and left for the next nurse to discover, there would be trouble and any nurse who ignored a 5.6 mg/dl without investigating it further would be in deep doo-doo.
daytonine, i agree with you completely, certainly do not ignore the test result and leave it for the next nurse to deal with. i just meant before you call the doctor you should find out if it was ionized or total by looking at the lab report, because the doctor will ask, or if he doesn't and you treat for hypocalcemia it could turn out that the figure was ionized. i would think from what i have read about hypocalcemia that if the levels were that low, there would be no mistaking it because you would see muscle twitching, tetany, convulsions - something the question "is this low" doesn't take into account. if your pt was convulsing and you saw that 5.6dg/dl you wouldn't think twice to act i am sure. if that was one of my test questions i would ask for clarification.
- these lab results are so foreign, just being a student! our sample lab reports always have both amounts. i guess i can add that to the list of ways ns is not like the real world! :)
Believe me, in the real world, the ordering doctor will know exactly what he ordered and why. Panic levels don't just show up without logical circumstances going on to bring them about. The docs usually know what is happening with patients long before we poor nurses do. It's their job.