I am currently working in rural acute care and am considering pursuing an NP program for the purposes of primary care practice. I have two questions:
1. Is there any value in pursuing a longer MSN-NP program compared to simply doing a program to qualify to write the EC exam?
2. Which university MSN program is least fluffy (ie. theoretical)?
My background is that I am a second-career nurse who initially graduated with a biochem BSc at Queens and worked for many years in research and scientific writing before completing an accelerated BSN program at York. I hated the York program because (similar to UT) it had a lot of (Watson, Rogers and Porifice) theory-based fluff in it, which was a complete waste of time. I would not consider pursuing further education at York for that reason, and I would not want to pursue any other nursing graduate program which is similarly fluffy.
I am really enjoying clinical practice and I would consider working as an NP in an ER or community, and I feel like having an MSN might give me more career avenues later on if I want to leave clinical care. However, from what I've seen at York (poster presentations), a lot of the graduate-level projects have minimal application to actual clinical or administrative practice.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
I am currently working in rural acute care and am considering pursuing an NP program for the purposes of primary care practice. I have two questions:
1. Is there any value in pursuing a longer MSN-NP program compared to simply doing a program to qualify to write the EC exam?
2. Which university MSN program is least fluffy (ie. theoretical)?
My background is that I am a second-career nurse who initially graduated with a biochem BSc at Queens and worked for many years in research and scientific writing before completing an accelerated BSN program at York. I hated the York program because (similar to UT) it had a lot of (Watson, Rogers and Porifice) theory-based fluff in it, which was a complete waste of time. I would not consider pursuing further education at York for that reason, and I would not want to pursue any other nursing graduate program which is similarly fluffy.
I am really enjoying clinical practice and I would consider working as an NP in an ER or community, and I feel like having an MSN might give me more career avenues later on if I want to leave clinical care. However, from what I've seen at York (poster presentations), a lot of the graduate-level projects have minimal application to actual clinical or administrative practice.