Jump to content

New York Times: Reassessing Flu Shots

Posted

I am trying....to be good....really I am......

LOL! Did you read the report? There's a link to it in the article. :cool:

?? I was being.......somewhat childish......but what link to what? I did click on your link and read the article. now i must go back and try to figure out what you mean....lol.

LOL! Did you read the report? There's a link to it in the article. :cool:

ah, no, 160 pages when set side to side like that would be a pain in the tuccus (sp). Did read a little. So, their point is to continue to improve,, that is a good thing? Maybe...

The cold hearted truth is that vaccination serves the individual, not the species.

Edited by morte

olddragger

Specializes in emergency, psy, case management.

I wonder what happens next?

The true "facts" are starting to come out and their ramifications will be interesting.

To tell you the truth I am beginning to loose faith in the health care profession. There are too many "others" directing what we know we need to do, yet, we don't take a stand. This mandatory flu vaccination is but one example.

Just skip to page 127.
thanks, by the way. I did. so they are pro vaccine, but see need for improvement, and won't acknowledge any problems with it....