Published Oct 27, 2008
shrimpchips, LPN
659 Posts
I have to write an assessment paper on my patient which basically includes...well, everything, including a whole review of systems. We also have to formulate two nursing diagnoses (one priority and one related). My patient is a 93-y.o. female who is comatose and has a multitude of problems - severe dementia r/t alzheimer's, anemia, DM type 2, glaucoma, hypertension, etc...she also has developed contractures on her right upper and lower extremities and has generalized left-sided weakness. she is non-responsive and maintains a persistent vegetative state. Based on this, I have come up with this dx:
At risk for impaired skin integrity r/t effects of immobility aeb disuse syndrome and incontinence.
I guess that could count for two diagnoses since i have a primary and a related one, but does this sound right? As for the rest, this is what I've come up with:
Goal - patient will not experience further complications of immobility
Plan - I'm actually somewhat confused between the difference of planning and implementation...my instructors make them both sound the same!
Interventions - maintain intact skin/tissue integrity, apply PROM to joints, patient will stay out of stool (or keep client clean & dry)
Evaluation - ...assess? lol
I have also formulated another one that I could use:
Self-care deficit syndrome: Feeding (2), Bathing (4), Dressing (4), Toileting (5), Instrumental (7) r/t persistent vegetative state (or is it okay to say r/t coma?). Patient is completely dependent on skilled nursing care and needs total assistance with ADL's.
Goal - according to Nursing Diagnosis: Application to Clinical Practice 12th Ed. by Lynda Juall Carpenito-Moyet (pg 548) the goal would be "the person will participate in feeding, dressing, toileting, bathing activities" - but that is impossible for a comatose patient. Therefore, I have come up with "Ensure that reisdent's needs are being met in a timely fashion and appearance is presentable at all times."
Plan - again, I don't know. I'm confused.
Interventions -
1. Ensure patient stays on continuous infusion of DiabetaSource at 45cc/hour
2. Ensure patient stays hydrated by administering 250cc water via PEG tube q4h
3. Keep patient clean & dry (change brief every hour or every 2 hours)
4. Bath patient daily
Evaluation - I guess you could get this from the family? They're going to tell you if something's not right or whatever.
Yay/nay? Alsothey want us to recognize any strengths that our patients may have. I cannot think of any for my patient - she is such a mess and her prognosis is very poor. The strengths part is only worth 4 points on the paper but those 4 points can make a difference between an A and a B!
Thank you all so much :bowingpur I'm still pretty new at this!
KEaFutureRNHopefully
22 Posts
Personally, I would probably go with the 1st dx.. I always thought that AEB info had to be symptoms or obj or subj data. I think if it was me I'd put At risk for impaired skin integrity r/t immobility AEB: neurological dysfunction, total urinary incontinence, hx of contractures, altered level of consciousness, hx of left sided weakness
or something like that...
In out NANDA book Coma has these nsg dx that may apply to your pt
1. Risk for aspiration: risk factors: impaired swallowing, loss of cough or gag reflex
2. Risk for disuse syndrome r/t altered level of consciousness impairing mobility
3. Self-care deficit r/t neuromuscular impairment
4. Total urinary incontinence r/t neurological dysfunction
Sorry if I confused you more! Hope that helped though:cheers:
Daytonite, BSN, RN
1 Article; 14,604 Posts
i will give you direction and get you started on this. some information about care planning. . .it is a problem determination process where you strategize solutions. using the nursing process to help you organize your way through the care planning process helps immensely. carpenito is very knowledgeable, but i have always found her difficult to understand unless i read the introductory chapter(s) of her care planning books several times.
this is an analogy of the nursing process (the problem solving process) applied to a normal life situation.
something that should be very clear about the care planning process is how the assessment information that is collected becomes the foundation of everything that follows. abnormal data collected during assessment forms the basis that supports nursing diagnoses. they are what you treat with nursing interventions. they are what you expect to change as a result of performing those nursing interventions. goals are expressed as positive changes experienced by that abnormal data. the eventual evaluation that is made to determine if nursing interventions are working, or worked, test to see what the status of that abnormal data is. so, what is learned in initial assessment is extremely important and pretty much drives the problem solving process.
this can be likened to police detectives who are investigating a crime, lets say murder. they are looking to find a murderer, not much different than trying to find a nursing diagnosis. they spend most of their time hunting down clues which is pretty much the same as assessing data. the more they have, the more likely they are going to make the best decision. they are also trying to make connections between all the different pieces of data that they collect--fit the pieces of a puzzle together to make a logical picture. you are attempting to do the same when you start out to make a care plan. the more information and data you have to work with, the better your diagnostic decisions are going to be.
there are actual nursing problems and potential nursing problems. this patient has plenty of actual problems. the problem for you is to figure out is what they are and express them in nursing language (nursing diagnosis). the actual process of diagnosing, as every medical student can tell you, is the result of logical problem determination. you must systematically break down information you obtain from the patient's medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests and reassemble it into patterns that fit well-defined groupings of symptoms that describe nursing diagnoses. you use your knowledge of the person's diseases and their treatment, the nursing process and a nursing diagnosis reference to help you.
this is the nursing process as it should be utilized to develop a care plan.
[*]determination of the patient's problem(s)/nursing diagnosis (make a list of the abnormal assessment data, match your abnormal assessment data to likely nursing diagnoses, decide on the nursing diagnoses to use). it helps to have a book with nursing diagnosis reference information in it. there are a number of ways to acquire this information.
[*]planning (write measurable goals/outcomes and nursing interventions)
[*]interventions are of four types
[*]care/perform/provide/assist (performing actual patient care)
[*]teach/educate/instruct/supervise (educating patient or caregiver)
[*]manage/refer/contact/notify (managing the care on behalf of the patient or caregiver)
[*]implementation (initiate the care plan)
[*]evaluation (determine if goals/outcomes have been met)
based on the information you provided:
step 1 assessment - collect data from medical record, do a physical assessment of the patient, assess adl's, look up information about your patient's medical diseases/conditions to learn about the signs and symptoms and pathophysiology - look up information about each of these conditions. what are the textbook signs and symptoms? did this patient have any of them? did you possibly miss seeing or observing any of the symptoms that the textbooks list? perhaps the patient is already being treated by the physician (meds, other therapies) for some of the symptoms so they are not as noticeable or have been altered (the goal of most interventions, including medical interventions is to improve, stabilize or support the deterioration of a condition). also, note the complications of the patient's diseases and conditions, particularly the alzheimer's disease and diabetes in this patient. why does this patient have contractures? what do you suppose is the underlying reason for the hypertension for someone who is comatose and primarily bed ridden? how is the patient being fed, bathed, moved?
step #2 determination of the patient's problem(s)/nursing diagnosis part 1 - make a list of the abnormal assessment data - i know there is more abnormal data than this. you just missed it. in the center of taber's cyclopedic medical dictionary is a 7 page nursing assessment form under the heading of nursing. use that as a guide to help you assess this patient.
step #2 determination of the patient's problem(s)/nursing diagnosis part 2 - match your abnormal assessment data to likely nursing diagnoses, decide on the nursing diagnoses to use
step #3 planning (write measurable goals/outcomes and nursing interventions) - goals/outcomes are the predicted results of the nursing interventions you will be ordering and performing - interventions specifically target the etiology of the problem or abnormal data/signs and symptoms/evidence that supports the existence of the problem - your overall goal is always aimed to alter or change something about the problem - how to construct a goal statement: https://allnurses.com/forums/2509305-post158.html
Anticipated problems, diagnoses that begin with "At Risk for" or "Risk for", do not have AEB evidence because these problems do not yet exist so there can be no evidence of their existence. There is only risk that they could occur.
my bad.. Daytonite is so smart!! My teacher always has us put "as WOULD be evidenced by..." instead of AEB :)
THANK YOU Daytonite!!!!!!!!!!