Published
Another post I made that (gasp) brought up the old "Should a BSN be the minimum requirement for bedside nursing?" topic up again. And it got me thinking:
We talk about if it should be or not but never seem to get anywhere with it.
Well, my problem with the whole debate is that nursing education is far from universal. In my opinion, at the ADN level, there is a fair amount of core requirements and theory. On the other hand, when we compare BSN programs to one another, the similarities are scarce.
This, to a degree, says to me we don't know what to teach at that level. It seems to advertise to the public that we have no universal nursing theory. If we can't agree on what our theory is, how will the public ever view us a profession worthy of respect?
So, I want to propose a few questions:
1. Should nursing education at the BSN level be made more universal? Or is it fine as it is, with each program having it's own unique flavor or personality?
2. Do you think the fact that we are so divided on what our nursing theory actually is promotes internal strife? Would having a more universal, core set of theories unite us? Or is the difference in opinion just a matter of flexibility?
3. If BSN education were to be more universal, what would be some elements that become a required part of their curriculum? Or do you think we can just do away with it and stick with ADN training being enough for bedside nursing?
AutumnApple
491 Posts
Hmph
Yes, I'm sure of it now. I suspected it before but now, I'm convinced we're not talking about the same thing.
Universal precautions?