Help with research critique

[NurseSpurk]

I was not sure of where exactly to put this.

I am supposed to critique a research article following a specific rubric. I'm having a lot of trouble with identifying the framework. I am supposed to define the theoretical or conceptual framework of the research article. So I have to determine which type of framework it has and describe it.

As far as I understand, the framework of a study is its "conceptual underpinning" right? Like what phenomenon is being studied, what variables are related to the phenomenon, and what outcomes the researcher expects to find (and why). I'm not sure about that, but I welcome any clarification. I'm having the most trouble understanding the difference between a theoretical and conceptual framework.

I have consulted with my professor a few times about my concerns and despite her best efforts, I end up more confused than when we started. Frankly, I'm extremely flustered. I don't want to sound arrogant but I have maintained a 4.0 so far and I feel like I have found my Achille's heel with this research class.

So, if anyone can help me I'd REALLY appreciate it:

What exactly is the framework of a research study?

How would one find it when it is not explicitly stated in the text?

What is the difference between a theoretical and a conceptual framework?

Would it be considered a theoretical framework even if no specific theory is referenced in the text or defined as the framework?

What if the study seems to not draw from any specific theory or concept model? Can one argue that it draws inspiration for several theories, several concept models, or a combination of the two?

I'll appreciate any help!

[Boomer MS, RN]

I was not sure of where exactly to put this.

I am supposed to critique a research article following a specific rubric. I'm having a lot of trouble with identifying the framework. I am supposed to define the theoretical or conceptual framework of the research article. So I have to determine which type of framework it has and describe it.

As far as I understand, the framework of a study is its "conceptual underpinning" right? Like what phenomenon is being studied, what variables are related to the phenomenon, and what outcomes the researcher expects to find (and why). I'm not sure about that, but I welcome any clarification. I'm having the most trouble understanding the difference between a theoretical and conceptual framework.

I have consulted with my professor a few times about my concerns and despite her best efforts, I end up more confused than when we started. Frankly, I'm extremely flustered. I don't want to sound arrogant but I have maintained a 4.0 so far and I feel like I have found my Achille's heel with this research class.

So, if anyone can help me I'd REALLY appreciate it:

What exactly is the framework of a research study?

How would one find it when it is not explicitly stated in the text?

What is the difference between a theoretical and a conceptual framework?

Would it be considered a theoretical framework even if no specific theory is referenced in the text or defined as the framework?

What if the study seems to not draw from any specific theory or concept model? Can one argue that it draws inspiration for several theories, several concept models, or a combination of the two?

I'll appreciate any help!

Critiquing scientific research is an acquired skill. If you are in a BSN program and this is your initial attempt at critiquing, your professor will not expect an advanced/comprehensive critique. But you have to start somewhere. Here is a link I got off the Internet.:Critiquhttp://www.nursingworld.org/research-toolkit/Framework-for-How-to-Read-and-Critique-a-Research

There are also textbooks that can guide you with definitions of each of the terms. Try Amazon or your school's library Critiquing involves critical thinking, in itself a valuable skill. Good luck.