Published
Personally, I prefer integrated programs. There are probably strengths and weaknesses to each style of learning, but I learn by seeing and doing more so than just reading. In the end, it all works out the same.
I think rotating clinical sites give you the opportunity to see several different ways of providing anesthesia for similar cases. The more exposure you have to various techniques, the better. The program I will be attending is integrated and most of the clinicals are done out of 1 hospital but they also use 3 other hospitals for certain rotations.
More than number of clinical sites, I think it is important to have a lot of good clinical experiences such as line placement, regionals, trauma and even open hearts. IMO.
I was accepted to both types of programs and choose the front loaded. I could have been in the or rather quickly with the intergrated but i cant see ever really understanding the finer point of the phyisiololgy. For me I saw myself being worried about my relation ships with the surgeons and preceptors and all the other skillzy type things rather than gaing a core foundation of knowledge. sure it would be funner to be in the OR sooner. (but thats not the point) I felt like they just wanted to use me as slave labor and wern't as intrested in my knowledge. now that i am doing it i know that there is no way i could have leared all that i have unless I am studying it every day all day. its good for our profession for us to be creatures of knowledge rather than skill
my 2 bits
nursemcdonald
7 Posts
Question and or Poll:
I am accepted to attend Anesthesia school at two respected institutions. While they differ in a few areas I am interested in people's feelings/ experiences regarding the following:
1. Front Loaded (Books 1st, Clinical Next) vs. Integrated (Clinical throughout)
2. Rotating Clinical Sites vs. Permanent Site
Thanks for your time...:)