Published Oct 26, 2016
Jamuhh
47 Posts
I DID do some searching in the forums before deciding to ask this but didn't find an answer.
IF I chose an acute care track (in peds, but does it matter? :)), could I later decide to work in primary care without any extra schooling? I understand going from primary to acute and needing extra in some cases, but has anyone had this particular experience or know if it's possible?
I can't figure out what I want. I like being in the hospital but I'm not sure if I'm cut out for the high-stress of ER or ICU.
If there is a thread that you know of and want to point me in that direction please feel free. TIA.
SopranoKris, MSN, RN, NP
3,152 Posts
ACNPs typically treat pts ages 13 & up. FNPs are certified for all ages. If you're only focused on Peds, it would be much harder to find a Peds-only acute care program, than a traditional ACNP program.
What appeals to you about acute care? Are you currently in an acute care setting as a nurse, such as ICU or ER? What appeals to you about family practice? Do you want to work in a hospital or an office? I think once you figure out which direction you want to go, it'll make it more clear which avenue to pursue.
TheNewbie
3 Posts
Drexel University offers a dual primary and acute pediatric track if you are thinking about going that route.
UF has both acute and primary tracks which is why I'm struggling. I'm a floor nurse now but I really like the hospital setting and the variety. On the other hand, I don't know if I'd be good in acute situations.
I've thought about it a little more and probably gonna go with primary cause I'd rather be comfortable than in over my head.