Okay, so I've been accepted into BScN at McMaster. My end goal has always been to become a nurse practitioner... While I know it's something in the future I need to worry about and not right now, I like to plan and have a direction.
I'm confused about the process here in Canada to become an NP. So I first complete my BScN, than I have to work for 2 years so that I can then apply to a PHCNP program? Is that correct? OR can I get into a program right out of school?
If I can't get into the program right out of school, it means 2 years work, and 2 years of school... so an additional 4 years on top of my BScN.
Is this the fastest method to achieving my goals, or am I misunderstanding something regrading the process?
Not sure if you realize how you come across in your post, but it seems you are self motivated. There may be times when your self motivation will not be perceived as a positive attribute by others. Sometimes mentors/preceptors can be put off by strongly self motivated students and will be less likely to offer guidance and tips that can lead to career success.
Not sure if you realize how you come across in your post, but it seems you are self motivated. There may be times when your self motivation will not be perceived as a positive attribute by others. Sometimes mentors/preceptors can be put off by strongly self motivated students and will be less likely to offer guidance and tips that can lead to career success.
No idea how I come across, but I can tell you I'm extremely competitive. That may or may not read a particular way to you.
So far I've only mentioned one primary goal in this thread, to find the most efficient method for completing the necessary schooling. I also see nothing inherently wrong with that.
You see nothing wrong with it because in your mind it's all about you and not about what is safest for patients.
Are you suggesting the way the system is set up, whereby someone can theoretically achieve a PHCNP in 3 years after their BScN is not "safe" for patients? If that's the case, I'd recommend that you lobby for change to the system.
Are you suggesting the way the system is set up, whereby someone can theoretically achieve a PHCNP in 3 years after their BScN is not "safe" for patients? If that's the case, I'd recommend that you lobby for change to the system.
What is your reason for wanting to become a nurse practitioner? If the provider aspect is what you want the most, instead of taking the 4 year BSCN then working then masters to become an NP, taking the MCAT and going to Medical school might be a much faster option. That's just my 2 cents.
What is your reason for wanting to become a nurse practitioner? If the provider aspect is what you want the most, instead of taking the 4 year BSCN then working then masters to become an NP, taking the MCAT and going to Medical school might be a much faster option. That's just my 2 cents.
It's very much what I'm interested in! The problem, while I know I'm academically competitive... obtaining a GPA of 3.8 (the avg GPA of UofT's med school applicants if I recall) could be very hard. I've already been accepted to BScN and getting a 3.0 for the Masters program while not easy... would be easier. I'm just brainstorming here, but off the top of my head... this seems logical?
Tetra
131 Posts
So you'd agree that would in fact be the shortest route? As per my OP, I'd be curious if you can think of a shorter one?