On the one hand, students (in our ADN program) complain that they don't understand Med-Surg and care-planning because we aren't giving them enough pathophysiology. But when you actually address pathophysiology, they complain that we are treating them like medical students and don't we know that they just want the stuff they will "need" to give patient care?
There is a cadre of students (and enabling faculty) who want to eviscerate the 3 credit pharmacology course. These are the same people who are lobbying to have a pathophysiology book added to our med-surg texts.
OMG! I gave a lecture and used the phrase "pre-ganglionic fibers" and 20 students almost had a collective seizure in front of me!
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
On the one hand, students (in our ADN program) complain that they don't understand Med-Surg and care-planning because we aren't giving them enough pathophysiology. But when you actually address pathophysiology, they complain that we are treating them like medical students and don't we know that they just want the stuff they will "need" to give patient care?
There is a cadre of students (and enabling faculty) who want to eviscerate the 3 credit pharmacology course. These are the same people who are lobbying to have a pathophysiology book added to our med-surg texts.
OMG! I gave a lecture and used the phrase "pre-ganglionic fibers" and 20 students almost had a collective seizure in front of me!