Published Sep 10, 2007
luvmy3kids
675 Posts
Ugg, I've been working on this problem all friggin day. It's due at 4pm and I just don't think I have the right answer... if someone feels really ambitious and wants to work it and tell me your answer... I'd be forever grateful. You just have to do it before 3pm... LOL
Anyway here it is:
The average annual consumption of soda by a teenage boy is 2484 dm 3
What is this value in cubic inches?
(BTW, the 3 is cubed... I just can't seem to make it look right on here).
Ok Ya'll... the timer starts now... LOL Only kidding, but if you happen to get this in the next few minutes, I'd love to know what you find out...
The conversion factors are as follows:
1 dm = .1 m
1 cm = .01m
2.54 cm = 1 inch
TIA
Anyone????
Asherah, BSN, RN
786 Posts
If you're still around, PM your email address and I can scan you my setup so you can see how its done.
stinebean
78 Posts
ok, we're on similar stuff in our chem class currently. btw, my answer is not properly rounded or put in the correct amount of sig figs because i'm still figuring that out (so it's in the calculator answer format)
2484 dm^3 (10cm^3)(.0610237441 in^3)= 2484(10)(.0610237441)
(1dm^3 )(1cm^3) 1
=1515.829801 in^3 (whoops!!! ignore this one!!!!! i still apparently have more to learn regarding this because my decimal point ended up in the wrong place. please look at asherah's answer instead. i'd delete this post, but i haven't found an option to do so.)
i've got some yummy crow to go eat now!
Actually, I'm sorry but the above answer is incorrect. My calculation came to 151,582.98 cubic inches, which I verified with google calculator
In google, you can enter the search as follows: 2484 decimeters cubed to cubic inches
To the original poster, if you're still around, I can scan you my setup, just let me know.
Deeks0
22 Posts
I don't know how to private msg but I'm interested in your setup...I'm already lost with conversions and its only Chapter 1!!!
Thank you all for your help. Thankfully... our instructor said we now have until tomorrow to turn in our hw. I guess I'm not the only nimwit in the class...
Ashera, I'm so totally clueless about this stuff... I can pm you but I'm not sure what you mean by set up? Is it something you just email me and I can use it as a tool?? Like I said... I'm totally clueless about this.
Thanks and I'll pm ya!
Jen
TNMommy
131 Posts
We are doing the same thing in my Chem class. Just had my first lab tonight on measurements and temperature measurements. I think that I did pretty well. Our instructor has us do homework but doesn't take it up. It is just practice for us. I think that I am doing well on the conversion factors. I get messed up some on the problems with multiple conversions. Love my instructor, though. He is very laid back and flexible. We don't even have to write out our procedures in our lab notebook. It is all on the chemistry website of my cc. We just print, cut and paste.
I hope that you do well in all of your classes! Wish me luck, too!!
Music in My Heart
1 Article; 4,111 Posts
Just to provide an in-post solution for future reference:
Given: volume of 2484 cubic decimeters
Find: volume in cubic inches
Unit Conversions:
Symbol Definition: X^3 means X cubed or X raised to the third power
The confusing part of working these problems is that the units are raised to an exponential power (in this case, cubed because it's a volume). The key is to understand the basic rules of exponentiation:
The other important thing to recognize is that the exponentiation applies to the units and provides the key to their conversion.
Example
Convert 2 cubic meters into cubic centimeters. You of course know that 1 meter = 100 centimeters . So, the linear conversion would simply be:
However, the volumetric conversion requires the exponentiation:
So, while 1 m = 100 cm, 1 cubic meter (m^3) = 1,000,000 cc (= 100^3 cc = 100^3 cm^3)
Therefore, the required conversion is:
If you do the algebraic expansion and cancel the like units, you end up with:
Now, if you're a geek like me, you wonder how many cans of soda that is.
OK, thanks everyone for your help... Now I have to go farther than just the answer and make sure I figure it with the lowest sig figs (which I believe would be 4 correct??) and then put it in scientific notation... so my answer is:
1.516 X 10 5
Is that correct?? Thanks again for all of your help!
OK, thanks everyone for your help... Now I have to go farther than just the answer and make sure I figure it with the lowest sig figs (which I believe would be 4 correct??) and then put it in scientific notation... so my answer is:1.516 X 10 5 Is that correct?? Thanks again for all of your help!
Yes, there should be four significant figures. In multiplication/division, your answer can have no more significant figures than does the term with the fewest significant figures.
All of your conversions are exact conversions so they can have as many significant figures as you choose. Therefore, your initial "given" (2484?) has the fewest significant figures: Four
Yes, you've rounded correctly and the answer is 1.516 x 10^5