Nurses in California, both LVNs and RNs, have to pay a surcharge when they renew their licenses. This is a small fee, 5 bucks for LVNs, and 10 for RNs; however, it is simply a redistribution of wealth. This money is supposed to go to fund the program found here http://www.healthprofessions.ca.gov/.
While I support the goals of the program, I am more than a little miffed at this blatent redistribution of wealth. I, and all nurses in California, are being forced by state law to donate to a charity, one of which we may or may not support!
Two more things about this Nurse Tax:
1. Not all the monies collected go to the fund, the lady that I spoke with today said that they only get a portion of that money, and the size of the portion that they recieve depends on the number of applications.
2. LVNs are paying to fund a program that currently does not exist; and will take months, if not longer to implement. This program was supposed to have been implemented in the early fall of 05.
Am I the only one that thinks this is wrong? I mean if the state government felt it was so important to fund, why did they not levy a general tax, instead of this stealth tax against nurses?
Licensure is a privilege and an option, not a right or requirement; but I agree, the general population should contribute too.
"privilege and option" Way to encourage folks to be nurses in a state where there is a shortage!!!..."If you don't like the crap that you have to put up with, then you do not have to be a nurse."
Sounds an awful lot what people who are for the Unions describe as what is said to them...
As far the politics, yeah that was a jab I could have left out...but I didn't, and it was more a statement of opinion than argument, I think that an arguement would given evidence of the statement
moosicle
73 Posts
I don't know if I need to comment.
Licensure is a privilege and an option, not a right or requirement; but I agree, the general population should contribute too.