Published Jan 25, 2009
cardiorn04
11 Posts
We just hired a new cardiac surgeon and he has been attaching a JP bulb to the mediastinal CT before transferring patients to the step-down unit. The reasoning is that patients can be more ambulatory and have less pain. Does anyone else do this? We are in the process of adding this to our CT policy, but have been unable to find research articles that support this practice.
Virgo_RN, BSN, RN
3,543 Posts
We've been doing this for years. The JP puts a gentle suction on the blake, allowing for mediastinal drainage. Patients are much more mobile, able to ambulate and get OOB for meals, when they have a JP bulb rather than a bulky box to lug around.
I understand that is is so much better for the patient in terms of ambulating, etc. Is there any research out there that we can cite for our policy/procedures?
Do you have access to CINAHL through your workplace? That's where I would start.
cvicugirl, BSN, RN
54 Posts
We had a surgeon who used to do that, too. I'm fairly certain our P+P used the same measurement frequency as a "normal" chest tube (measured and dumped hourly) and it also included regular instruction re: JP care. Emptying the JP with a large syringe instead of squeezing the contents into a speci cup will decrease your chance of blood exposure.
WalkieTalkie, RN
674 Posts
We have a surgeon who does this on his fresh post-ops...which is a huge PIA when the patient is bleeding a lot :stone
Other than that, they seem to work pretty well.