Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Research - Nursing /

Sticky question



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,134 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.

Mar 06, 2009 09:42 AM

Sticky question


Our institution is having a major issue with the excepted practice to only enroll a patient into a single research project at a time.

Does your institution have a policy? Do you practice this as a norm?

I have scoured the Belmont, CFR, ICH and our policy and procedures. I can not find mention of a 30 day moratorium on enrolling/re-enrolling into a new study.

Please help my doctors are fighting over keeping their patients for their studies if this is the rule.


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
Reply
4 Comments
No. 1
from anc33
Old Mar 06, 2009, 02:36 PM

Default Re: Sticky question
30 days is usually standard practice but participation in other studies should be addressed in your protocols. If you are doing drug studies you definitely need to make sure that there is a washout period which could be much longer than 30 days depending on the half-life of the drug. It is hard to judge the situation without more details, especially without knowing what type of studies your facility does. Personally, as a coordinator, I would be wary of enrolling a patient on another study so soon.
Top

1 Reader Gave Kudos
 
No. 2
from lauraburke
Old Apr 25, 2009, 12:10 AM
Updated Apr 25, 2009 at 12:17 AM by lauraburke

Default Re: Sticky question
You have got to be kidding me! We do not have such a broad sweeping policy since our organization has many researchers doing studies involving the same patients. We may have a patient who is on a drug trial who is also involved in a social science study or a nursing research study. The inclusion/exclusion criteria should be specific enough to clarify sound scientific rationale for exclusion, not an outdated policy that reflects "because that's the way we've always done it!" Let's start thinking and putting these careful thoughts into writing! It's VERY appropriate to let patients be involved in more than one study at a time, depending on what is being studied. I've had patients who, at the same time, had an investigational cardiac device implanted, were taking an investigational antidysrhythmic drug, participated in a qualitative nursing research study where they explained how they coped with living with chronic heart failure, and were in the experimental group of an NIH funded study to evaluate using Customized Computer Home Care - a website to learn to better manage their chronic cardiac disease by tracking their symptoms, meds, diet, and activity and communicating with their nurses, therapists, physicians, and other patients to cope with their illness. I've very glad that our organization is forward-thinking enough to see that research can take many forms.
Top
 
No. 3
from anc33
Old Apr 25, 2009, 11:10 AM

Default Re: Sticky question
I don't think that enrolling a patient into a QOL study (for example) and a drug study simultaneously is an issue unless is it expressly forbidden in one of the protocols. Even if participation was OK per protocol, the questions asked or interventions from one study could affect the other and the validity of the data could be in question. Also, if you were doing two studies that required blood draws, you could inadvertently go over the maximum allowable amount (for us this is defined by our IRB). As I said, we would need more information from the OP as to what kinds of studies they do to see if it is an issue.
Top
 
No. 4
from featherzRN
Old Apr 26, 2009, 02:52 PM

Default Re: Sticky question
So far, we do only drug studies and inclusion/exclusion always states in our studies that they have to wait at least 30 days after exiting a drug or device study. I am guessing a study that involves something non drug/device related would be fine.
Top
 
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
134 members
1,591 guests
1,725

6

California Imposes Stricter Rules Regarding Drug Abuse In...

18

Are older nurses being forced out of the profession?

3

An outlook in California?

8

Australian surgeons successfully separate conjoined twins

41

Disruptive behavior by doctors, nurses persists a year...

31

Woman sues after police tackle her in ER during premature...

5

Beyond The Last Lecture -For Randy & Jai Pausch nurses...

18

WHO: Give at-risk groups anti-flu drugs early

21

Nursing, medical schools should work together, experts say

6

Army nurse honored after 100th birthday



1

Society Needs Care Too

11

Why am I doing this, anyway?

2

Nurse Heal Thyself

9

My Papa, why I am the nurse I am today.

17

I made it through

11

An angel's gaze

14

A Sister Never Forgets

16

Ruby's Marbles

37

What Do Operating Room Nurses Do?

14

My Little Old Jedi

20

I love this job......

23

"I hear voices"

19

Preventing FRUTI (Foley Related Urinary Tract Infection) in...

24

Error and Attitude

10

It's Just a Shower





Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: