Re: MDS QUESTIONS
Hi.
As Talino said, perhaps you can set the ARD so that you will not "capture" the fecal impaction. Or perhaps you can spend hours as you relentlessly try to prove that a fecal impaction is not an
MDS bowel problem...(a UTI is
Usually
Treated
Incognito)

But it's hard to win in the
Avoid
Regulatory
Detection game. The resident will show up as a new in-house fracture and a SCSA--with a 99.9% "opportunity" for review during your next survey. Could one make the case that the facility failed to recognize a significant change in condition which CAUSED actual harm--a bowel "problem" and fall/fracture?

FOCUS---Care about the CARE--or BEWARE (with a prayer...)
TODAY(not when/if the SCSA and RAPs are completed) the professional care team must assure that this resident has a PLAN, and RECEIVES, the APPROPRIATE

CARE to:
- monitor/ameliorate these 2 "events",
- prevent/control future occurrences (maintain or improve function), and
- prevent (or recognize and manage) adverse consequences from these 2 "events."
Am sure that the Unit Manager, DN, QI nurse, and Administrator already know about this "hit". When an adverse event (harm) occurs, it is reported. The facility must be "pro-active", not "survey reactive". To quote Forrest Gump, "S __ IT HAPPENS" (in this case, NOT.) Most assuredly, your facility "knows the drill"--look at this resident's care and see if a process was missing, not followed (ignored or unknown), or ineffective. Tell the ombudsman, local agency, and anyone else who must/will listen--a problem is/was identified and "solved." A facility POC
now will usually prevent a "G" citation.

Surveyors don't like the
Avoid
Regulatory
Detection or
Manage
Definitions
Successfully games...(or
Facility
Recognized
Adverse
Uncorrected
Developments.)
Good luck!!
Nursing News