New York Times: Reassessing Flu Shots

  1. Hi folks, I just ran across this article today and wanted to share it here with you all. I think it's very interesting that even the main stream media is raising legitimate questions, not just fringe/"quack" sites.
  2. Visit Anna Flaxis profile page

    About Anna Flaxis, ASN

    Joined: Oct '10; Posts: 2,886; Likes: 8,704


  3. by   morte
    I am be good....really I am......
  4. by   Anna Flaxis
    LOL! Did you read the report? There's a link to it in the article.
  5. by   morte
    ?? I was being.......somewhat childish......but what link to what? I did click on your link and read the article. now i must go back and try to figure out what you
    Quote from ~*Stargazer*~
    LOL! Did you read the report? There's a link to it in the article.
    ah, no, 160 pages when set side to side like that would be a pain in the tuccus (sp). Did read a little. So, their point is to continue to improve,, that is a good thing? Maybe...
    The cold hearted truth is that vaccination serves the individual, not the species.
    Last edit by morte on Nov 18, '12
  6. by   Anna Flaxis
    Just skip to page 127.
  7. by   olddragger
    I wonder what happens next?
    The true "facts" are starting to come out and their ramifications will be interesting.
    To tell you the truth I am beginning to loose faith in the health care profession. There are too many "others" directing what we know we need to do, yet, we don't take a stand. This mandatory flu vaccination is but one example.
  8. by   morte
    Quote from ~*Stargazer*~
    Just skip to page 127.
    thanks, by the way. I did. so they are pro vaccine, but see need for improvement, and won't acknowledge any problems with it....
  9. by   Anna Flaxis
    I'm not sure what you mean.