Published
More information has surfaced on this case.
According to the New York Times:
While the child’s travel history was clear, and worrying, it was less clear whether he had any known contacts with people infected with Ebola.
There have been lots of suspicious cases in NYC after Dr. Spencer's diagnosis. In most all if the cases Ebola was ruled out without blood tests.
They were especially cautious about drawing blood from a 5-year-old, but because of the patient’s recent travel history and pattern of symptoms, the city health department decided to move forward with testing.
As with all diseases, children are prone to dehydrate quickly with any kind of illness that results in loss of bodily fluids and are more vulnerable that adults.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/28/nyregion/5-year-old-new-york-ebola.html?_r=0
Update......
The result of the test is negative. Out of an abundance of caution, further negative Ebola tests are required on subsequent days to ensure that the patient is cleared. The patient will also be tested for common respiratory viruses. The patient will remain in isolation until all test results have returned
tnbutterfly - Mary, BSN
83 Articles; 5,923 Posts
The latest to add to the fears. There are not many details to be found, but we all are hoping the labwork is negative.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/year-boy-observation-nyc-hospital-ebola-concerns/story?id=26478362
Here is another article that says the boy is not in isolation and has not been tested.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/27/ebola-new-york_n_6053150.html
Both say the boy hasn't been tested for Ebola.
I wonder why not???