Tenet/CNA Election Procedures Agreement

Nurses Union

Published

federal labor official to prosecute scheme to force nurses under union boss control

decision challenges backroom deal between company and union officials that undermines the rights of independent employees

washington, dc (february 16, 2009) - after a protracted legal battle, the national labor relations board (nlrb) general counsel has sustained part of an appeal filed by national right to work foundation attorneys challenging a backroom unionization deal between tenet healthcare corporation and the california nurses association (cna) union.

as part of their efforts to forcibly unionize hospital employees across the country, cna officials and tenet corporation agreed to a series of measures designed to impose union monopoly bargaining on unwilling nurses. this so-called election procedures agreement (epa) gave union organizers preferential access to tenet facilities and gagged nurses who opposed unionization.

the agreement between tenet and the cna also subverted the nlrb's oversight role during workplace elections. under the cna union's scheme, the nlrb's only role is to count ballots and rubber-stamp the union's monopoly bargaining privileges, effectively gutting the already limited rights of employees who wish to resist unionization.

with free legal assistance from the national right to work foundation, nurses in houston and philadelphia have repeatedly challenged the legality of this arrangement. in earlier proceedings, tenet was forced to give nurses who opposed forced unionism equal access to hospital facilities.

a recent appeal filed by foundation attorneys challenging the epa was partly sustained by the nlrb's general counsel. the general counsel agreed with foundation attorneys that a provision of the epa committing tenet to binding arbitration if union officials and the company are unable to agree on a first contract constitutes illegal pre-recognition bargaining between the union and the company, allowing union officials to negotiate substantive terms of employment for workers they don't even represent. the legality of this provision will now be litigated before an administrative law judge and ultimately the federal courts.

"cna bosses shouldn't be empowered to negotiate on behalf of workers they don't even represent," said patrick semmens, legal information director of the national right to work foundation. "tenet corporation and cna operatives have stacked the deck in favor of union organizers, stifling independent-minded employees in an attempt to push houston and philadelphia nurses under union boss control, like it or not."

What is doubtful in Texas?

Nurses are working together to improve healthcare at their facilities.

Widespread unionization of nurses.

Specializes in Psych , Peds ,Nicu.
Widespread unionization of nurses.

Maybe it's doubtful , but your silence is deafening re. an effective alternate strategy to handle poor management , until / unless anti unionist come up with such a strategy there will always be discontented nurse looking for assistance from unions .

Sorry, Off work for a few days.

There are many ways to address this and unions are obviously NOT the answer. We do it through employee based committees, annual meetings with our hospital president(every employee), as well as open door meetings with nursing management. This has worked well for many years. If it doesn't, there's always another hospital hiring.

As far as disgruntled nurses looking to unions, there will always be those who are like lemmings and follow the group decision no matter what the cost. In my opinion, unions are only good for lining the leaders pockets and emptying the nurses!

Specializes in Critical-care RN.

Not anytime soon......................

Sorry, Off work for a few days.

There are many ways to address this and unions are obviously NOT the answer. We do it through employee based committees, annual meetings with our hospital president(every employee), as well as open door meetings with nursing management. This has worked well for many years. If it doesn't, there's always another hospital hiring.

As far as disgruntled nurses looking to unions, there will always be those who are like lemmings and follow the group decision no matter what the cost. In my opinion, unions are only good for lining the leaders pockets and emptying the nurses!

If all those things work for you in reality, you either have a truly exceptional hospital management or an amazing ability to self-delude. Back in '95 we got new management with a bottom line oriented corporate mentality. They bought the other hospital in town and closed it down, just so neither nurses nor patients would have anyplace else to go. They cut staffing, increased workloads, told us that we were used to "too good" a standard of care and that our patients had been spoiled. And they told us if we didn't like it, we could go somewhere else. We stayed and unionized instead. Now that management team is all gone, the top of our salary scale is well over 200% of what it used to be, we have safe staffing protections and don't need to hire lots of travelers any more like we used to. Turnover is down and patient satisfaction is up. My union has pretty high dues, but the additional salary and benefits have a value about 10 times the cost of the annual dues. Show me any other investment that can bring me a 1000% return.

And what's this about being gone from work - you aren't doing this stuff on paid time are you?

Specializes in Psych , Peds ,Nicu.
sorry, off work for a few days.

there are many ways to address this and unions are obviously not the answer. we do it through employee based committees, annual meetings with our hospital president(every employee), as well as open door meetings with nursing management. this has worked well for many years. if it doesn't, there's always another hospital hiring. while this is working well for you and your fellow employees , your enlightened management is not reflective of all employers . so your advice boils down to individual action or finding another employer , which is the advice anti unionist usually give and did not address my request for a new and effective strategy for nurse who are not unionised to get an unreceptive employer to change their actions .

as far as disgruntled nurses looking to unions, there will always be those who are like lemmings and follow the group decision here you fail to address , why did the group decided to seek out a union , if all had been ok the individual would have no group to follow ! no matter what the cost. in my opinion, unions are only good for lining the leaders pockets and emptying the nurses!your anti unionism seems only to be driven by concern re.:twocents: 's that may be the cost of the union services ( dues ) you would have to pay rather than any principle

friendly advise , if your contributions are written while you are on your employers $ , be careful , the it dept . can record your activity and if it suits your employer could use this activity to base disciplinary action against you , check your employee handbook . no this is not an attempt to shut you up , as i've said before i may not like your inputs , but i don't want to lose them for a reason like this .

+ Add a Comment