Airway management mishap results in tragic outcome

Specialties CRNA

Published

this is a cross-posting from ogp - and a tragic example of why the airway is not the most important thing, it is the only thing!

also, an interesting question brought up on ogp: why was a healthy young woman who appeared to be of normal body habitus intubated nasally in the first place?

doctor's error to cost $35 million

county to settle suit over brain damage

by mickey ciokajlo and tom rybarczyk

tribune staff reporters

published october 4, 2005

cook county is set to approve a $35 million medical malpractice settlement with a woman who suffered severe brain damage after undergoing a botched procedure at a county-run hospital.

the woman, a 30-year-old mother of two, was subjected to the failed procedure at oak forest hospital only because physicians there had misdiagnosed a viral infection as appendicitis, according to the lawyers involved.

the case is one of the largest settlements in cook county and matches a $35 million settlement reached last year in a case involving an anesthesiologist at northwestern memorial hospital that left a boy brain damaged. that case did not involve the county.

"the facts in the case are horrible," said cook county commissioner peter silvestri, chairman of the board's litigation subcommittee, which approved the settlement last month. "the settlement is justified and certainly should be paid."

at its meeting wednesday, the county board will be asked to approve the settlement, a record for it in medical malpractice cases. william maddux, the presiding judge of the law division, approved the settlement last week.

under the terms, the county would pay $20 million, with insurance carriers funding the remainder.

the case involves neveen morkos, a christian who immigrated to the united states to avoid religious discrimination in egypt, and dr. gustavo albear, an anesthesiologist.

morkos and her husband, hany, moved to tinley park in february 2004 to live near family members, who had immigrated a few years earlier, said eugene pavalon, the morkos' lawyer.

they did not have health insurance, so when neveen morkos experienced acute stomach pain on may 19, 2004, an ambulance drove her to oak forest hospital, which has a small emergency room.

cook county runs three hospitals that provide health care regardless of a person's ability to pay.

problem misdiagnosed

doctors told morkos she needed an emergency appendectomy. it was later determined that she had a viral infection that did not require surgery.

albear, who was 78 at the time, was called to prepare morkos for surgery.

albear medicated morkos to get her muscles to relax. since morkos would not be able to breathe on her own while medicated, albear then inserted a tube through her nose to provide oxygen to her lungs.

however, albear did not secure the tube properly, pavalon said. when the tube became dislodged, albear was unable to reinsert it, depriving morkos of oxygen.

by the time surgeons were able to perform an emergency tracheostomy to provide oxygen to morkos, 10 to 12 minutes had passed. she then went into cardiac arrest.

"there was no doubt that the negligence in this case caused this tragic occurrence and neveen's irreversible brain damage," said pavalon, a lawyer with the chicago firm pavalon, gifford, laatsch & marino. "so not only do the circumstances justify this record settlement, but this is one of those traumatic occurrences that simply should not have happened."

after the incident, morkos initially was in a vegetative state, but she has improved. though she requires round-the-clock care and cannot walk, she can now say her husband's name and recognizes her children, halana, 6, and victor, 3, pavalon said. she also can write in arabic.

morkos is in a burbank nursing, but her family desperately wants her home, pavalon said. the money from the settlement will allow them to build or buy and modify a house and provide in-home care.

morkos was not working at the time of the incident because the family was newly arrived in the country and she was caring for the children. she was college-educated and had taught computer science in egypt.

she was always looking for a better place," said nermeen morkos, neveen's older sister.

nermeen morkos said she visits her sister every day and looks forward to bringing her home.

"we hope she can walk someday," nermeen morkos said. "we are praying to god; we are waiting for a miracle for her."

albear could not be reached for comment.

when asked in the deposition he gave for the lawsuit if he remembered the episode, albear said, "i will recall for the rest of my life."

albear retired in 2004 after the incident, said patrick driscoll, head of the civil actions bureau of the cook county state's attorney's office.

oak forest hospital did not discipline albear and state records do not show any previous disciplinary issues. he renewed his license with the state last summer, but driscoll said he understands that albear, who turns 80 on wednesday, is no longer practicing.

although no parties in the case directly blame his age, pavalon said he thinks it was a factor. albear also had arthritis in his hands.

"i think probably he never should have been in that [operating] room," pavalon said.

no age restrictions

silvestri said the county does not have age restrictions for its doctors. he said when this case was discussed in committee, commissioners asked county officials to research the issue after they were told that some hospitals impose work limitations based upon age.

through a spokeswoman, officials of cook county's bureau of health services and county board president john stroger's office declined to comment before the board's approval.

albear worked for 23 years at palos community hospital before retiring in 1994. in his deposition, albear said he got a job at oak forest hospital six months later, noting he enjoyed his work and wasn't ready for retirement.

commissioner mike quigley, vice chairman of the litigation subcommittee, said albear's age was not so much the issue but rather his overall ability to perform.

"the more you hear about the case, the worse it gets," quigley said. "someone should have been able to determine that this physician was incapable of performing critical procedures. he shouldn't have been in a position to fail."

There are lots of options

Intubatable LMAs where you slide an ET tube thru an LMA

emergency crichothyrotomy kit

fiberoptic

we have a device called a bullord(sp) that is lighted and once the provider see's the cords they push the tube in.

we have a difficult airway cart with all of these items on it and the OR and PACU staff know how to set them up.

I wonder how good the equipment was. this is a county hospital the patient may have lost the airway long before it was noticed. I still wonder about the

nasal ETT. It is only done here if the surgeon needs to work in the mouth, like dental work, at the CRNAs discretion.

My heart goes out to this Family, but 35 million is a lot of money and the lawyer will get at least 11 million. You have to wonder what services will be cut and what state of the art equipment will not be bought, to pay this 20 million.

here they stop providers call after age 60.

Does the nasal intubation seem strange to anyone else? We always just "slammed" them in the ER and in the field.

CRNAs can do emergency trachs - not surgical, to be specific. But there is a nifty device that should be in every OR (or at least readily available) called an emergency crichothyrotomy kit. Here is a link that shows you what it looks like:

http://www.progressivemed.com/emsproducts/airway/emergency_airway.html

You insert this through the cricothyroid membrane and use an adaptor to attach a jet ventilator.

A surgical tracheostomy is a procedure performed by a surgeon, not anesthesia. It takes even skilled surgeons several minutes to perform this procedure, so it is literally the last option in an emergent, can't ventilate/intubate scenario.

We used stuff like this as Combat Medics in the Army. They're pretty cool and don't take a lot of skill to use.

We've even used a couple 14g. IV catheters for a short-term quick-fix. I doubt this is very effective (no pulse oximeters or anything handy at the time), but it's better than nothing, in a pinch. I don't recommend this in a hospital, but in combat, you roll with what you've got (and save lives doing it).

Really? If that is the case this early in your experience, then I would rethink the technique of LMA placement. LMAs are used in the difficult airway algorithm because - correctly placed - they are so reliable.

One of the CRNAs who proctored me has been giving anesthesia for nearly forty years, and he told me this very early on:

Do not tell me that you cannot ventilate. It is YOUR JOB to ventilate the patient, so you better %^&*ing figure it out. Maybe, maybe once or twice in your career will you have a patient that you really cannot ventilate. Then, it's up to you to get oxygen into that patient by whatever means necessary. Until then, don't tell me that it's the LMA, or the habitus of the patient, or some other excuse. Look to yourself first before you go blaming the equipment. And don't tell me that you cannot ventilate. You MUST ventilate.

I cried the whole way home that afternoon. But here I am, just a few weeks from graduation, and I am thankful I learned that tough lesson early on. I know that it will rear its head someday, but I have not been in a "can't intubate, can't ventilate" situation ever since. I haven't had to change LMAs, intubate mid-case (except for the one time that a small case became much bigger when the surgeon ran into an unexpected surgical issue), or chuck the LMA for the tube at induction. If the ventilation is sub-optimal for any reason before the case gets started, the case doesn't start until ventilation is adequate. Seems a no-brainer, but we have all worked with providers who have a questionable LMA and just "hope that it gets us through this case".

That is courting disaster. You MUST ventilate.

My technique was not the problem. Their was a CRNA with me in both instances & yes there are patients in which an LMA does not work as you would like it to. I have heard many CRNAs say that have had some patients they could not get good air exchange and ventilate well with an LMA & so they intubated them. Maybe it was the placement & maybe not, but you have to figure out quickly what's going on & change what your doing. Sometimes that means intubating instead of using the LMA. Earlier I was not talking about the fasttrack & intubating thru it in an emergency. My whole point was that you have to be prepared because each patient is different & there will be a time when the method you have selected will not work-even an LMA is not fullproof.

Does the nasal intubation seem strange to anyone else? We always just "slammed" them in the ER and in the field.

As one of the above posters stated this may have been initial management of a recognized difficult airway. One management strategy is "awake" blind nasal intubation where the patient is kept breathing spontaneously and sedated with versed/fentanyl or ketamine or a combination, the airway is anesthetized topically with lidocaine, a transtracheal block is sometimes done, and afrin is used to reduce bleeding. The tube is advanced slowly while listening for breathing through the tube, as it reaches the cords the patient will almost suck the tube through. This is a blind technique and I've seen many older (and very experienced) providers are more comfortable with this than fiberoptic. I agree that there is more to this story than told by the lawyers.

+ Add a Comment