Vaccination Mandating

1 hour ago, DesiDani said:

I know, that was the reason for my post. As if just because only RNs and physicians didn't leave does not mean that any hospital can survive without the support staff  that possibly did leave because of mandate.

I was responding to a post about nurses leaving. He even says "nurses" three times and makes no mention or anyone else. 

    In an organization of 12,000+ people the loss of under 100 people is negligible and I happen to know that much of the losses where white collar types because I work there and have heard things. There certainly is no detectable loss of the support staff you have such a low opinion of. 

8 hours ago, PMFB-RN said:

I was responding to a post about nurses leaving. He even says "nurses" three times and makes no mention or anyone else. 

    In an organization of 12,000+ people the loss of under 100 people is negligible and I happen to know that much of the losses where white collar types because I work there and have heard things. There certainly is no detectable loss of the support staff you have such a low opinion of. 

Perhaps DesiDani lives in a red state where vaccination status is lower.

On 1/4/2022 at 6:51 AM, subee said:

Perhaps DesiDani lives in a red state where vaccination status is lower.

I live in a state that is apart of the USA. 

6 hours ago, DesiDani said:

I live in a state that is apart of the USA. 

Agan, I ask so what?  There are quite a few moronic states in the USA.  

On 1/8/2022 at 7:17 AM, subee said:

Agan, I ask so what?  There are quite a few moronic states in the USA.  

Good old projection. 

Thanks for sharing.

31 minutes ago, DesiDani said:

Good old projection. 

Thanks for sharing.

Is she projecting the partisan pandemic idiocy of her state onto your state? Which state do you live in again? And is it a secessionist state ("apart") or is it a state still interested in preserving these United States and is "a part" of that republic?

56 minutes ago, toomuchbaloney said:

Is she projecting the partisan pandemic idiocy of her state onto your state? Which state do you live in again? And is it a secessionist state ("apart") or is it a state still interested in preserving these United States and is "a part" of that republic?

 

The choir speaks. 

4 hours ago, DesiDani said:

Good old projection. 

Thanks for sharing.

Uh.....you need to go check out what projection is.  My question was "so what".

4 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:

... And is it a secessionist state ("apart") or is it a state still interested in preserving these United States and is "a part" of that republic?

Please clarify what exactly you're saying here.

59 minutes ago, chare said:

Please clarify what exactly you're saying here.

I'm asking if the use of 'apart' was a typo or a reference to political ideology that considers secession an option.  That sort of political rhetoric has regained popularity recently.  

So the supreme court just heard arguments for vaccine mandates via OSHA and medicare. I found the following video interesting regarding the legality of vaccine mandates. What I found most interesting is that there is facilities that are not giving medical exemptions when necessary such as having a adverse reaction (myocarditis, pericarditis, anaphylaxis)  to the first vaccine but still requiring the second vaccination. The lawyer in the video below states that even though pharmaceutical companies enjoy legal protections against adverse reactions, employers requiring covid19 vaccinations as a condition of an employment are still legally liable for any vaccine injuries to their employee's. The video below is a conversation between Dr. Chris Martenson and attorney Robert Barnes.

Below is an article going over the vaccine mandates being heard at the supreme court:

https://www.heritage.org/courts/commentary/supreme-court-just-heard-oral-arguments-vaccine-mandate-cases-here-are-the

9 hours ago, Sciencedude1 said:

So the supreme court just heard arguments for vaccine mandates via OSHA and medicare. I found the following video interesting regarding the legality of vaccine mandates. What I found most interesting is that there is facilities that are not giving medical exemptions when necessary such as having a adverse reaction (myocarditis, pericarditis, anaphylaxis)  to the first vaccine but still requiring the second vaccination. The lawyer in the video below states that even though pharmaceutical companies enjoy legal protections against adverse reactions, employers requiring covid19 vaccinations as a condition of an employment are still legally liable for any vaccine injuries to their employee's. The video below is a conversation between Dr. Chris Martenson and attorney Robert Barnes.

Below is an article going over the vaccine mandates being heard at the supreme court:

https://www.heritage.org/courts/commentary/supreme-court-just-heard-oral-arguments-vaccine-mandate-cases-here-are-the

I would guess those facilities are not giving medical exemptions for those reasons because they are not valid reasons for a medical exemption.

As for the video, you're giving free advertising to a lawyer with a reputation that at best is described as 'sketchy'.

He's a lawyer who when defending Alex Jones for him claiming the parents of kids killed at Sandy Hook were just making it up, and in the process spewed various Q-based conspiracy theories.  https://www.thedailybeast.com/sandy-hook-parents-lawyer-wants-alex-jones-attorney-removed-over-infowars-attack