So I am having a bit of a struggle at work. I work in a clinic that sees patients with injuries. We often communicate injury status to their work which is protected transfer if information under workers compensation. I was basically told that my communication is too detailed and that I need to step it down. I was told that I am diagnosing the patient by saying (example) "this patient shows symptoms consistent with potential xxxxxxx". I was trained that this, with a strong supporting assessment, is good documentation.
Now, don't take this wrong, but I am pretty smart. I have great assessment skills. If I find a potential problem with a patient and forward the assessment info on to a NP or MD, I often put " It seems the patient is demonstrating symptoms consistent with xxxxx".
Now, I understand that a lot of what I'm being told is risk management from my supervisor, but I relish the fact that I know my stuff and can put symptoms together and identify a problem. Apparently, its fine for me to do that but not to communicate it. But if that's the case, what's the point? I really feel my spirit being killed now. I've been happy with this job until today.
I guess I just support nurses being more than what they have been traditionally. I don't feel that I am diagnosing patients. I feel that I am contributing to the health and well being of my patient in a manner that is more than just passing some meds.
Basically, am I being over zealous in my treatment? I can take the criticism if I am. Maybe I do need to tone back... What are your opinions in the matter?
More Like This
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
So I am having a bit of a struggle at work. I work in a clinic that sees patients with injuries. We often communicate injury status to their work which is protected transfer if information under workers compensation. I was basically told that my communication is too detailed and that I need to step it down. I was told that I am diagnosing the patient by saying (example) "this patient shows symptoms consistent with potential xxxxxxx". I was trained that this, with a strong supporting assessment, is good documentation.
Now, don't take this wrong, but I am pretty smart. I have great assessment skills. If I find a potential problem with a patient and forward the assessment info on to a NP or MD, I often put " It seems the patient is demonstrating symptoms consistent with xxxxx".
Now, I understand that a lot of what I'm being told is risk management from my supervisor, but I relish the fact that I know my stuff and can put symptoms together and identify a problem. Apparently, its fine for me to do that but not to communicate it. But if that's the case, what's the point? I really feel my spirit being killed now. I've been happy with this job until today.
I guess I just support nurses being more than what they have been traditionally. I don't feel that I am diagnosing patients. I feel that I am contributing to the health and well being of my patient in a manner that is more than just passing some meds.
Basically, am I being over zealous in my treatment? I can take the criticism if I am. Maybe I do need to tone back... What are your opinions in the matter?