Published Jun 7, 2009
feralnostalgia
178 Posts
hey there - I've been gathering lots of information about what RNs do, but I was just wondering if anyone could tell me a bit more about the LPN role.
I've always heard that as a new RN you should start out on a Med-Surg unit and stay there for at least a year. is there a similar path for a new LPN? where do they get their experience from? I'm told most of them work in LTC, but what about home health, rehab, and hospitals? can you start out in any of those places as an LPN? rehab sounds particularly attractive. are there LPNs in psych nursing? what are LPN hours usually like? are they usually going to be the same 12 hours a day, 3 days a week setup that RNs have?
I'm going to apply to an 11 month LPN program on monday, not yet sure if I'll go there or to the 2 year ADN program I got accepted to. at this point having real, full time work by June 2010 instead of May 2011 is very, very attractive. (my goal here is to move out on my own and support myself ASAP, and get my feet wet before deciding if I want to go for my BSN. I figure I can do that just as well as an LPN as an ADN-RN, so I'm just curious about the LPN role)
thanks guys
AntFlip7395
147 Posts
The LPN role varies drastically from state to state and from facility to facility. Many LPNs do work in LTC, but a good many also work in home health, rehab, doctor's offices, and ambulatory care facilities. Some do work in hospitals, however, some choose not to utilize LPNs to their full potential or not at all due to limited scope of practice. Again, that depends on the state you live in. Hours are the same as the RN, given the same facility. RNs do not necessarily have to start out on med-surg. There are preceptorship programs in other areas, such as ER, ICU, and OB. If an LPN starts out in a hospital, they are most likely to work in med-surg or telemetry; that's not to say they couldn't work elsewhere.
LPNs are competent nurses and anyone who is an LPN should be proud of it. To make the choice, it's a matter of priorities. Is it more important to be financially independent in a year or would it make more sense in the long run to bite the bullet and go for RN. Nursing schools are competitive, since you already have acceptance into an RN program, it may be in your best interests to go ahead with that program if you can possibly afford to. Another thing, competition for nursing jobs is stiff in certain areas, many new grads are having trouble getting that first job, both LPN and RN. But I don't think anyone could really deny that having RN behind your name, especially if BSN follows it does make you more marketable. It really depends on what your ultimate nursing goal is. I believe that LPNs do work in psych, but depending on the area and facility, you may only be passing meds. Some questions you need to ask yourself:
If I pursue LPN now, will I go right back to school for RN or will I get accustomed to the money and not having to study? This happens to many people, I can personally attest to it.
What area of nursing really interests you? If you are wanting to work in a critical care area, for example, you really need to pursue RN. There are some LPNs that work in critical care, but these are mainly nurses who have been doing it for a long time.
I will tell you that it is easier for an RN to bridge to BSN v. an LPN to BSN. Yes, there is Indiana State University, but there are a plethora of RN-BSN bridge programs out there. And would it ultimately be cheaper to cut out the cost of an LPN program in favor of getting your RN and then having your future employer help you out with your BSN?
Hope I've been of some help.
Again, that depends on the state you live in.
If an LPN starts out in a hospital, they are most likely to work in med-surg or telemetry; that's not to say they couldn't work elsewhere.
Is it more important to be financially independent in a year or would it make more sense in the long run to bite the bullet and go for RN. Nursing schools are competitive, since you already have acceptance into an RN program, it may be in your best interests to go ahead with that program if you can possibly afford to.
It really depends on what your ultimate nursing goal is.
And would it ultimately be cheaper to cut out the cost of an LPN program in favor of getting your RN and then having your future employer help you out with your BSN?
***newmember***
2 Posts
I've been an LPN for along time. 25 years to be exact. At the time, the hospital I worked for as an ER tech paid for my schooling. I have never regretted it! I have ALWAYS worked in the critical care areas. I have been ACLS certified since 1987 (back when you HAD to pass it). I know times have changed a little, but LPN's are still needed. It is a good first step because you get so much more clinical training. You will be a better bedside nurse. I started day one in ICU, but the manager knew me from my work in the ER. I knew arrhythmias and while going to school the hospital taught me how to set up the different pressure lines so she said 'we'll teach you the rest'. That too was during a mild nursing shortage though. I have worked in PACU and the last 8 years or so in ER, levels 1 & 2. My most recent adventure has been traveling and I have had no trouble getting jobs. Granted there are not as many, but I still get a job. After all this I decided to bridge and am about finished. The ONLY reason I did it was to open up more options as a traveler. I want to be able to go anywhere I want to go. That is not possible as an LPN. LPN's should not be looked down on. That program is a monster! Anyone that can pass it should receive a kudo! Good luck with you decision. BTW, the facility I am at now, there is no difference at all in the two nurses. I even spike blood at this facility which I have never been allowed to do in my life. But it is allowed by this state with facility training. The practice acts do vary from state to state.