At our hospital a low mag level isn't considered critical until it is
I suppose (to answer my own question) it is the same with K+ levels. It isn't considered critical until it is 3.0...yet it is aggressively replaced with lower levels.
My concern is that most often the docs are usually aggressive in replacing even modest low levels of magnesium. I am wondering what the rationale is behind not considering it a critical level until it is
I would appreciate your thoughts.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
At our hospital a low mag level isn't considered critical until it is
I suppose (to answer my own question) it is the same with K+ levels. It isn't considered critical until it is 3.0...yet it is aggressively replaced with lower levels.
My concern is that most often the docs are usually aggressive in replacing even modest low levels of magnesium. I am wondering what the rationale is behind not considering it a critical level until it is
I would appreciate your thoughts.