Hurst or Saunders for NCLEX content review?

Published

Hi everyone!

I am preparing to take my NCLEX for the 2nd time and really want to make sure that I am choosing the best content and question strategy sources!

For question strategy, I am doing both U World and La Charity!

For content, I am unsure if I should do Hurst, Saunders, or both.

Has anyone done Hurst and/or Saunders and can share some advice? I was devastated failing the first time, so any advice would be reallyyy appreciated!

Up Vote Up Vote ×

Every classmate I talked to always swore by Huret. I used Saunders as a knowledge base when I needed more rationale, but the questions aren't great for NCLEX IMHO. I liked Kaplan, it is tedious and expensive but gave me good preparation for the test.

Up Vote Up Vote ×

Thank you that really helps!! Yea I heard quite a few people say that the saunders questions aren't great, so I decided to choose Uworld and LaCharity for Qs instead. :)

Can you tell me if reading the resources documents in Hurst necessary or just the videos for content?

Thanks!!

Up Vote Up Vote ×
Specializes in Intensive Care Unit (Trauma & Cardiac).

Currently doing saunders and hurst for content review. reading every chapter in saunders and watching every videos from hurst. I should say that hurst is good but they are not as detailed as saunders.

Up Vote Up Vote ×
+ Join the Discussion