Our faculty is about to engage in a discussion of the continued value of a "major careplan". One based upon an assigned patient in clinical and inclusive of five Nursing diagnoses, goals/outcomes, interventions (with rationales drawn from literature citations), and evaluation.
The careplan is graded (but only 10 points out of 400 or so for the semester) and they tend to run 20-30 pages in length. Students spend considerable time, energy and anxiety during the completion of this project (and are required to do one for each of our four principle clinical courses with increasing degrees of acumen). There is little doubt that they learn from them, but there is also a sense that their time (and that of the instructor who must grade them) may be more productively spent engaged in other activities that accomplish the same objectives.
IS THERE ANY RESEARCH DOCUMENTING A TREND AWAY FROM MAJOR CAREPLAN AS PART OF UNDERGRADUATE NURSING EDUCATION? Is the careplan, as some allege, a dinosaur?