god forbid i do not want to deconstruct their document.
i am sure there is a simpler way but they asked to answer in writing and the question as simple as that: "give examples from personal practice that address the competencies".
so we know that teaching like anything else has 4 stages. assessment, planing, implementation and evaluation.
my question is why it comes under planing in the entry to practice competencies?
what example would you give to illustrative the situation: "
teaches ucps based on assessment of learning needs"
my example is: "i gather them all together and speak with them"
this is a simple answer to the simple question, however it has nothing to do with planing.
of course i can say "i plan
to gather them all together and speak with them" so it will be planing.
sounds like an action. why this competency is under planing and not under implementation?
either of the 120 competencies could be under either assessment, planing, implementation or evaluation because any process can be divided into 4 stages.
how did they decide which one comes under what? may be the division was done randomly?