The Death Knell Of Hospices Everywhere

Specialties Hospice

Published

So the buzz is around the office today about new Medicare Part D changes that are going to majorly and adversely affect patients and their families, and also be the death knell for hospices throughout the country.

See the following link for the actual final determination and new rules that are supposed to be effective May 1, 2014:

http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/Hospice/Downloads/Part-D-Payment-Hospice-Final-2014-Guidance.pdf

The Readers' Digest version of this new policy is that patients, once enrolled onto hospice services, will only be covered for medications directly related to the palliation and symptom management of their illness. In example, Sally Jones is admitted to hospice with a Dx: Cervical Cancer. Medicare will now only cover medications directly related to this illness (e.g. Analgesics, Anti-Emetics, Laxatives/Stool Softeners, Anti-Anxiety). But if Sally Jones also suffers from COPD and is also s/p CABG, medications related to those diagnoses will no longer be covered under Medicare Part D and will become the liability of the patient or the hospice provider if they so choose to cover the medications.

So what this means is that hospice patients facing terminal illness for one problem may very well become at greater risk secondary to other comorbidities than their primary diagnosis. Additionally, this will add financial stressors to families already dealing with terminal illness. Coupled with the cuts already hitting hospice providers last year, this is surely going to sink some hospices altogether. And we'e already seeing patients getting their rejection notices for medications two months ahead of this change being implemented.

I'm curious to know thoughts on this. Is this buzzing within your own work culture? Better freshen up those resumes, ladies and gents, because this could be a game changer.

Chordinger

Hospice patients often come to hospice with "exotic" meds already on their POC.

Once again that doesn't mean the hospice agency needs to cover it without first trying formulary meds. And there's almost always a few more cost effective meds to try. This has been standard operating procedure for years.

The thread is about revisions to the regulations, right?

I believe that hospices have been engaged in NOT doing what they SHOULD do and that is the reason that we experience reactive rule changes.

I think that knowing what we should do within our specialties is important. Knowing what we should do helps us to advocate for our patients, right?

We can't forget healthcare is a limited resource. Cost will always be important. Hospice is all about dying with dignity, comfort, and support. And if med changes don't support those goals you're doing something wrong.

Specializes in Hospice, Geriatrics, Wounds.

Don't hospices come up with their own formularies? There is no master list of medications on formulary that's produced by anyone other than the hospice facility/company?

The issues seems to be that supposedly Medicare is limited what medications a patient can receive while on hospice, and you've given the example of duloxetine. But as far as I can tell it's the hospice facility/company that is choosing to make that unavailable in the situation you describe.

It's a collaboration between the hospice and pharmacy. And yes, our hospice doesn't cover that particular medication, and neither will pts part D.

When a pt elects hospice they sign consents, and agree to be responsible for anything not on the plan of care. This includes non-formulary medications.

Yes, the example I used was cymbalta (brand or generic). The point being that with the new regulations, Part D would no longer pay for MOST medications, as they expect Part A to cover (whether related to the terminal dx or not).

The hospice doesn't have to cover cymbalta or its generic. Regardless of anyone's opinion. Its not formulary (with my organization), and I've had no issues with my patients agreeing to switch to a comparative.

I think it's a great idea to close this thread. I'm sure done with it.....

+ Add a Comment