Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) /

Help!



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,503 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.

Nov 27, 2001 04:38 PM

Help!

by rdhdnrs

Had a csection patient under GETA yesterday with suspected pseudocholinesterase deficiency; can someone enlighten me?


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
Reply
2 Comments
No. 1
from WntrMute2
Old Nov 29, 2001, 06:12 PM

Here goes, plasma pseudocholenesterase is what metabolizes succinylcholine. Succinylcholine is a very short acting depolarizing muscular relaxant, that mimics the action of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. It is not metabolized at the junction by acetylcholinesterase and there is no reversal agent as there is for non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers. This has good points and bad, as you found out. The good is that it's action is very rapid and in almost all cases very short acting. Onset is 45 seconds or so and it is gone in 2-3 min. making it the agent of choice for rapid sequence intubations (something pregnant women are in need of in a stat c-section with a full stomach and the increased pressure on the abdomen ). However succinylcholenine must diffuse away from the NMJ and into the plasma where it is metabolized by plasma pseudcholinesterase. In a few percent of the population, that enzyme is missing or partially inactivated leading to a prolonged blockade. This usually results in an ICU ventilator dependant stay until the succs degrades. This takes from a few hours to a day. There is no test or predicting this effect that I know of and it is one of the potentials hazards of anesthesia. In the future, she should get rapid acting non-depolarizing agents if the need for RSI occurs again, abiet with a slight increased risk of aspiration during induction and intubation. Probably more a theoretical hazard than a real one.
Top
 
No. 2
from rdhdnrs
Old Nov 30, 2001, 07:19 AM

Thanks, that helps!!!
Top
 
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
401 members
3,417 guests
3,818

0

Patient Evaluation of Retail Clinic Care

0

The hard to reach on-call doctor, and its effects on...

1

Woman charged with passing off prescription drug as...

5

Man in "Vegetative State" was conscious for 23...

2

Interesting article on ThedaCare's Collaborative Care Model

7

Possible breakthrough regarding MS

63

16th Philly area hospital to stop delivering babies: Mercy...

10

Really interesting article on Indian open hearts

8

High-Tech Pump Does What Her Heart Can't

6

Air Force RN Found Not Guilty






Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: