student in need of help

Well i think every nursing school has this kind of problems. Usually professors do what ever they want. Even some time is not in book. They assume we have to think as they think like 30 year of nursing experience. We just read book and that's it vs they have experience. I really can't support your idea but if only few people pick that answer you won't win. Usually when majority people pick same answer better. If it's a medication question etc maybe u could beat well but this type questions are really not easy to fight.

The above poster said it very well. In a question that requires nursing judgment, you are pretty much at the mercy of the nursing staff unless a few dozen of your classmates also raise a ruckus.

So the reason I posted was if I can prove my answer belongs then I get the point(as per our dean) I am a horrible test taker and my clinical evals are always amazing, coursework the same, never been reprimanded or anything close, so I am challenging it.

Oh how true that statement is!

professors do what ever they want. Even some time is not in book. They assume we have to think as they think like 30 year of nursing experience.

You could make the argument that by asking how long the kidney is good for, the patient is forward looking in an attempt to make plans for his life - which indicates acceptance. He is not dwelling on the past (i.e. kid died for his kidney). Acceptance is the final stage of grief - if pt has accepted the kidney and is discussing long term plans, his grieving dilemma has resolved.

I agree with the above posters. Additionally the choice stating that he was seen asking his doctor how many more years his kidney will give him may not show he has overcome his moral dilemma b/c it could be interpreted as the pt. being conflicted. As in, "this child had to die to give me a kidney for me to get only x more years of life while he had a whole life ahead of him/her". Depending on the doctor's answer, it may or may not show that he has resolved his dilemma. I think it shows he may still be trying to work it out. I may or may not be right...just my 2 cents. Hope it helps you see things from another angle.

Did not see "greenerpastures" reply before I posted. That's a good way to look at it, too and will bolster your point.

which was my argument all along...If you teach us to think critically well okay its more then just the two other obvious answers. That is why I am challenging it.

I would go with "No" on the third choice. Asking the doctor how long the kidney is good for may indicate that he is thinking "I have X number of years to feel guilty having a child's kidney". "Once the kidney fails I can have an adult's kidney and end my guilt"

I would go with "No" on the third choice. Asking the doctor how long the kidney is good for may indicate that he is thinking "I have X number of years to feel guilty having a child's kidney". "Once the kidney fails I can have an adult's kidney and end my guilt"

^this. This is not a healthy sign of resolving moral conflict. This is more indicative of planning on a shortened life span.

I agree that the third response would not be about accepting the new kidney. More about trying to reason with himself his expanded lifespan, determine how long he has to handle the guilt, or other unresolved issues, but acceptance wouldn't be my first thought if a questions like that was asked of a patient.

The one you selected was not the best response. ; the one chosen was the best answer; other posters have explained the rationale quite nicely.