47

heron said:

QED

Time to watch George Carlin videos on YouTube.

GrumpyRN said:

Which specific question?

The one you said I didn't answer.

I'll give you the advice you gave me.  Pay attention.

GrumpyRN said:

You didn't "call me out", you obfuscated, deflected and changed the subject.

I'm not twisted in knots, I can see exactly what's happening and I do not need to try to remember which news organisation is "fake news" or what "alternative facts have been told today or what utter nonsense Trump has spouted.

You don't even remember the subject.

Beerman said:

The one you said I didn't answer.

I'll give you the advice you gave me.  Pay attention.

You don't even remember the subject.

 

Well, I do remember. It's instructive to read your outrage at being misrepresented but seem to have no insight into how dependent you are on that same misrepresentation (among other tactics) to "defeat" your rhetorical "enemies".

Well, it's your rabbit hole and I'm noping out. I made a good faith attempt to explain my POV as best I could in a short-form forum. Either I failed and you seriously misunderstood what I was saying or you deliberately used misrepresentation to "prove" me wrong. So, don't ask me a question unless you want to hear the answer. Think twice before you belittle me or try to invalidate my thinking by misrepresenting what I wrote. I won't help you dig your rabbit holes.

Don't start nuthin', won't be nuthin'.

Sincerely, LRL, still keeping my feet dry.

heron said:

Well, I do remember. It's instructive to read your outrage at being misrepresented but seem to have no insight into how dependent you are on that same misrepresentation (among other tactics) to "defeat" your rhetorical "enemies".

Well, it's your rabbit hole and I'm noping out. I made a good faith attempt to explain my POV as best I could in a short-form forum. Either I failed and you seriously misunderstood what I was saying or you deliberately used misrepresentation to "prove" me wrong. So, don't ask me a question unless you want to hear the answer. Think twice before you belittle me or try to invalidate my thinking by misrepresenting what I wrote. I won't help you dig your rabbit holes.

Don't start nuthin', won't be nuthin'. 

The post of mine your're quoting and replying to was not addressed to you.  

I only ask questions I'd like an answer to, and the last questions I've asked of you have yet to be answered.  

What is it that you said that you think I'm misrepresenting?

Beerman said:

The post of mine your're quoting and replying to was not addressed to you.  

I only ask questions I'd like an answer to, and the last questions I've asked of you have yet to be answered.  

What is it that you said that you think I'm misrepresenting?

It's still not raining.

Sincerely, LRL

heron said:

It's still not raining.

Sincerely, LRL

I don't know what that means, or what LRL is.

Beerman said:

I don't know what that means, or what LRL is.

LRL = Radical Lunatic Lefty

The references to rain and dry feet refer back to Judge Judy Scheindlin. She used to tell litigants on her show who were obviously trying to con her, "Don't pee on my foot and tell me it's raining.” I don't know where it actually originated.

Sincerely, LRL

heron said:

LRL = Radical Lunatic Lefty

I thought it was Radical Lefty Lunatic.  I think that's how Grumpy first said it.

I guess not much difference.

Either way, I would think that would be RLL.  After so many times I thought I'd clarify.

heron said:

The references to rain and dry feet refer back to Judge Judy Scheindlin. She used to tell litigants on her show who were obviously trying to con her, "Don't pee on my foot and tell me it's raining.” I don't know where it actually originated.

Sincerely, LRL

OK, then.

Remember when you and @GrumpyRN said I wouldn't answer a question?  You were sorta snarky about it.  And I actually did answer it when I realized it was meant to be serious.

Now you both avoid my questions.  Seems like Judge Judy is helping you deflect... 

Beerman said:

I thought it was Radical Lefty Lunatic.  I think that's how Grumpy first said it.

I guess not much difference.

Either way, I would think that would be RLL.  After so many times I thought I'd clarify.

OK, then.

Remember when you and @GrumpyRN said I wouldn't answer a question?  You were sorta snarky about it.  And I actually did answer it when I realized it was meant to be serious.

Now you both avoid my questions.  Seems like Judge Judy is helping you deflect... 

Obviously, I disagree, but you do you, boo.

Sincerely, LRL, dodging puddles and moving on ...

heron said:

Obviously, I disagree, but you do you, boo.

Sincerely, LRL, dodging puddles and moving on ...

You say I'm trying to con you, and that I misrepresent what you say.  But, you want to move on without backing it up...

heron said:

The Epstein files are small potatoes. I wanna see the Jack Smith files.

I'd like to hear more about Jack Smith, too.  I'm sure it'll be fascinating.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hawley-rips-jack-smiths-bidens-stasi-probe-calls-alleged-spying-abuse-power-beyond-watergate