Recently a tech at work (who is a nursing student) was working on practice NCLEX questions from a book that will remain nameless. Every now and then she would ask me about a question. I found two of them particularly interesting.
1. First was about a low hemoglobin report.
Two of the answers really didn't make sense. I thought the correct answer was "monitor the patient and draw the next scheduled hemoglobin in 6 hours. Turns out, the "correct" answer was "prepare for an immediate transfusion of PRBCs."
2. Next asks about what to do if V-tach is seen on the monitor.
To me, none of the answers looked any good. The one the book said was "correct:" go to the medication dispensing machine and get an emergency dose of Lidocaine.
Now, for (1), I suppose they are really asking "what is a normal Hgb," and 8.9 is abnormal. However, I have never worked anywhere that transfuses 8.9. I ran into a similar question when I was working as a GN and preparing for my boards--I worked on a thoracic surgery floor that didn't transfuse until the low 7s; I could never understand questions that wanted you to transfuse at 8.0 (let alone 8.9). Although this question could be technically OKish.
As for (2)--this is 100%, always wrong. How do we know this not just psedo-V tach 2/2 teeth brushing? More importantly, starting CPR in a pulseless patient is more important that giving meds. I expressed my confusion to the tech who was studying, and she was not happy that she spent a good bit of money on a book written by people with a lot of letters after their names.
Thoughts?
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Recently a tech at work (who is a nursing student) was working on practice NCLEX questions from a book that will remain nameless. Every now and then she would ask me about a question. I found two of them particularly interesting.
1. First was about a low hemoglobin report.
Two of the answers really didn't make sense. I thought the correct answer was "monitor the patient and draw the next scheduled hemoglobin in 6 hours. Turns out, the "correct" answer was "prepare for an immediate transfusion of PRBCs."
2. Next asks about what to do if V-tach is seen on the monitor.
To me, none of the answers looked any good. The one the book said was "correct:" go to the medication dispensing machine and get an emergency dose of Lidocaine.
Now, for (1), I suppose they are really asking "what is a normal Hgb," and 8.9 is abnormal. However, I have never worked anywhere that transfuses 8.9. I ran into a similar question when I was working as a GN and preparing for my boards--I worked on a thoracic surgery floor that didn't transfuse until the low 7s; I could never understand questions that wanted you to transfuse at 8.0 (let alone 8.9). Although this question could be technically OKish.
As for (2)--this is 100%, always wrong. How do we know this not just psedo-V tach 2/2 teeth brushing? More importantly, starting CPR in a pulseless patient is more important that giving meds. I expressed my confusion to the tech who was studying, and she was not happy that she spent a good bit of money on a book written by people with a lot of letters after their names.
Thoughts?