Recently a tech at work (who is a nursing student) was working on practice NCLEX questions from a book that will remain nameless. Every now and then she would ask me about a question. I found two of them particularly interesting.
1. First was about a low hemoglobin report.
Two of the answers really didn't make sense. I thought the correct answer was "monitor the patient and draw the next scheduled hemoglobin in 6 hours. Turns out, the "correct" answer was "prepare for an immediate transfusion of PRBCs."
2. Next asks about what to do if V-tach is seen on the monitor.
To me, none of the answers looked any good. The one the book said was "correct:" go to the medication dispensing machine and get an emergency dose of Lidocaine.
Now, for (1), I suppose they are really asking "what is a normal Hgb," and 8.9 is abnormal. However, I have never worked anywhere that transfuses 8.9. I ran into a similar question when I was working as a GN and preparing for my boards--I worked on a thoracic surgery floor that didn't transfuse until the low 7s; I could never understand questions that wanted you to transfuse at 8.0 (let alone 8.9). Although this question could be technically OKish.
As for (2)--this is 100%, always wrong. How do we know this not just psedo-V tach 2/2 teeth brushing? More importantly, starting CPR in a pulseless patient is more important that giving meds. I expressed my confusion to the tech who was studying, and she was not happy that she spent a good bit of money on a book written by people with a lot of letters after their names.
Recently a tech at work (who is a nursing student) was working on practice NCLEX questions from a book that will remain nameless. Every now and then she would ask me about a question. I found two of them particularly interesting.
1. First was about a low hemoglobin report.
Two of the answers really didn't make sense. I thought the correct answer was "monitor the patient and draw the next scheduled hemoglobin in 6 hours. Turns out, the "correct" answer was "prepare for an immediate transfusion of PRBCs."
2. Next asks about what to do if V-tach is seen on the monitor.
To me, none of the answers looked any good. The one the book said was "correct:" go to the medication dispensing machine and get an emergency dose of Lidocaine.
Now, for (1), I suppose they are really asking "what is a normal Hgb," and 8.9 is abnormal. However, I have never worked anywhere that transfuses 8.9. I ran into a similar question when I was working as a GN and preparing for my boards--I worked on a thoracic surgery floor that didn't transfuse until the low 7s; I could never understand questions that wanted you to transfuse at 8.0 (let alone 8.9). Although this question could be technically OKish.
As for (2)--this is 100%, always wrong. How do we know this not just psedo-V tach 2/2 teeth brushing? More importantly, starting CPR in a pulseless patient is more important that giving meds. I expressed my confusion to the tech who was studying, and she was not happy that she spent a good bit of money on a book written by people with a lot of letters after their names.
Thoughts?