I have been reading the posts about ADN vs BSN and it got me to thinking about situations I see at my school. Putting aside which degree is "better" than another, why are there not more stringent criteria in place for classes themselves? A lot of my classmates that are going for nursing, rad tech, pharm tech, etc have taken and failed certain classes up to three times and when they finally do pass it is scrapping by with a C.
There are tudors available for classes that are not utilized by people that need them. I feel that failing and retaking a class so many times shows a lack of effort, focus, and determination to reach the desired goal.
I am not even talking about core classes, these are just prereqs to get into a program. If someone does not have a basic grasp on basic skills (math, English, science) why are they being allowed into programs that take it for granted that you can utilize basic knowledge to apply to a specific skill set?
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
I have been reading the posts about ADN vs BSN and it got me to thinking about situations I see at my school. Putting aside which degree is "better" than another, why are there not more stringent criteria in place for classes themselves? A lot of my classmates that are going for nursing, rad tech, pharm tech, etc have taken and failed certain classes up to three times and when they finally do pass it is scrapping by with a C.
There are tudors available for classes that are not utilized by people that need them. I feel that failing and retaking a class so many times shows a lack of effort, focus, and determination to reach the desired goal.
I am not even talking about core classes, these are just prereqs to get into a program. If someone does not have a basic grasp on basic skills (math, English, science) why are they being allowed into programs that take it for granted that you can utilize basic knowledge to apply to a specific skill set?