I had an older (60s) patient with a lot of generalized edema (from co-morbidities). He was getting 125 ml per hour IV fluid all my shift, into a Left midarm IV that had just hit the 70 - hour - since - insertion mark.
The IV cath was 20 gauge (1 inch long, I think). His right arm couldn't be used for IVs or anything (a medical condition was the reason for that).
So his ordered IV Fluid (normal saline, not a vesicant) goes in at 125 ml per hour all shift, no complaints, and the IV machine never alarms occlusion or anything else.
However, at just about shift change I noticed that his left arm (the one getting the IV fluids) is swollen - swollen in just about every place except for a 4-5 inch area around the IV cath insertion site itself. I put his left arm up on pillows, and again made sure that all around the IV site itself was soft, (which it was), although the rest of his left lower arm had taut skin. Weird. So I left the IV fluid running. Since report was in 45 minutes, I figured I'd ask the next shift nurse to call IV therapy to put in a new one. When the next shift nurse came in and saw the man's left arm swelling, she turned off the infusion (didn't check the area around the cath insertion itself) and she immediately pulled the IV cath out (the tip was intact, there was no bleeding after, we did apply a pressure dressing, there were no signs of infection).
Long question short: Should I have stopped the infusion immediately when I first saw the peripheral swelling? Second question (if so) should I have immediately removed the IV cath, while waiting for the new IV (even though it would have left the patient with no IV access)?
The patient has a condition where it was more than possible that he might have needed emergency meds pushed into an IV line between pulling the old one out, and IV therapy finding time for putting a new one in. The IV she (my next shift replacement) pulled out (in the left arm site, which as I mentioned had baby - soft surrounding skin for a hands-span area around it) was the only IV access the patient had at the time she pulled the IV out.
Brutal honesty is appreciated here. I promise I won't argue, I just want to learn, so if there is a next time, I do things 100% right.
If that area 4-5 inches or so around the 20 guage 1 inch IV cath insertion wasn't baby soft, I'd have turned off the infusion immediately myself. However, I wouldn't have pulled out his only line, even though it was not an ideal line, until IV therapy had gotten up there and placed a new one for him. I did recognize that the patient's arm swelling was not a good sign, and did place it up on 3 pillows. He denied any pain in the arm or at the IV site, and he was afebrile.
Thanks for any feedback.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
I had an older (60s) patient with a lot of generalized edema (from co-morbidities). He was getting 125 ml per hour IV fluid all my shift, into a Left midarm IV that had just hit the 70 - hour - since - insertion mark.
The IV cath was 20 gauge (1 inch long, I think). His right arm couldn't be used for IVs or anything (a medical condition was the reason for that).
So his ordered IV Fluid (normal saline, not a vesicant) goes in at 125 ml per hour all shift, no complaints, and the IV machine never alarms occlusion or anything else.
However, at just about shift change I noticed that his left arm (the one getting the IV fluids) is swollen - swollen in just about every place except for a 4-5 inch area around the IV cath insertion site itself. I put his left arm up on pillows, and again made sure that all around the IV site itself was soft, (which it was), although the rest of his left lower arm had taut skin. Weird. So I left the IV fluid running. Since report was in 45 minutes, I figured I'd ask the next shift nurse to call IV therapy to put in a new one. When the next shift nurse came in and saw the man's left arm swelling, she turned off the infusion (didn't check the area around the cath insertion itself) and she immediately pulled the IV cath out (the tip was intact, there was no bleeding after, we did apply a pressure dressing, there were no signs of infection).
Long question short: Should I have stopped the infusion immediately when I first saw the peripheral swelling? Second question (if so) should I have immediately removed the IV cath, while waiting for the new IV (even though it would have left the patient with no IV access)?
The patient has a condition where it was more than possible that he might have needed emergency meds pushed into an IV line between pulling the old one out, and IV therapy finding time for putting a new one in. The IV she (my next shift replacement) pulled out (in the left arm site, which as I mentioned had baby - soft surrounding skin for a hands-span area around it) was the only IV access the patient had at the time she pulled the IV out.
Brutal honesty is appreciated here. I promise I won't argue, I just want to learn, so if there is a next time, I do things 100% right.
If that area 4-5 inches or so around the 20 guage 1 inch IV cath insertion wasn't baby soft, I'd have turned off the infusion immediately myself. However, I wouldn't have pulled out his only line, even though it was not an ideal line, until IV therapy had gotten up there and placed a new one for him. I did recognize that the patient's arm swelling was not a good sign, and did place it up on 3 pillows. He denied any pain in the arm or at the IV site, and he was afebrile.
Thanks for any feedback.