Let's just say the following is a hypothetical....
An RN needs to access the Pyxis controlled refrigerated meds for a specific patient. When the RN discovers the needed med is not in the fridge she changes the number of "meds removed" to "0", shuts the fridge door and low and behold a Pyxis drawer shoots open containing DILAUDID! Yes. Eight vials of Dilaudid sitting in the drawer with unfettered access. Could never happen, right?
Now, for fun, lets say the RN grabs the charge immediately and beckons her to the med room to experience the unbelievable. The same sequence of events are repeated with the same outcome - a free for all of the tightest of controlled narcotics.
Pharmacy is called, arrives immediately and denies very arrogantly and defiantly the possibility of said hypothetical Pyxis malfunction. Again, the same sequence of events are repeated by RN with same outcome - Dilaudid drawer access, no paper trail!
Persistent in defiance, pharmacy rep demands RN repeat sequence two more times, each outcome the same as the original. At this point the pharmacy rep, holding fast to his original responses of arrogance and defiance, insinuates the RN "broke" the machine, and verbally berates her for leaving Dilaudid vials in their box in Pyxis drawer(!) Just an example of "if you can't blame the nurse at least give her a kick".
Thank God in this situation Pharmacy has ownership of the Pyxis. Can you imagine the field day a hospital would have if they could pin faulty Pyxis programming(*) on nursing? I can assure you the RN that discovered the malfunction would be punished severly and not a stretch to assume reported to the BON.
I don't know what happened, if anything, from a pharmacy standpoint regarding this scenario. Do any of you know what the legal implications are for an institution not adequately controlling a controlled substance?
(*) Let's also assume Pyxis had very recently been reprogrammed to allow Pyxis- only access to refrigerated meds.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Let's just say the following is a hypothetical....
An RN needs to access the Pyxis controlled refrigerated meds for a specific patient. When the RN discovers the needed med is not in the fridge she changes the number of "meds removed" to "0", shuts the fridge door and low and behold a Pyxis drawer shoots open containing DILAUDID! Yes. Eight vials of Dilaudid sitting in the drawer with unfettered access. Could never happen, right?
Now, for fun, lets say the RN grabs the charge immediately and beckons her to the med room to experience the unbelievable. The same sequence of events are repeated with the same outcome - a free for all of the tightest of controlled narcotics.
Pharmacy is called, arrives immediately and denies very arrogantly and defiantly the possibility of said hypothetical Pyxis malfunction. Again, the same sequence of events are repeated by RN with same outcome - Dilaudid drawer access, no paper trail!
Persistent in defiance, pharmacy rep demands RN repeat sequence two more times, each outcome the same as the original. At this point the pharmacy rep, holding fast to his original responses of arrogance and defiance, insinuates the RN "broke" the machine, and verbally berates her for leaving Dilaudid vials in their box in Pyxis drawer(!) Just an example of "if you can't blame the nurse at least give her a kick".
Thank God in this situation Pharmacy has ownership of the Pyxis. Can you imagine the field day a hospital would have if they could pin faulty Pyxis programming(*) on nursing? I can assure you the RN that discovered the malfunction would be punished severly and not a stretch to assume reported to the BON.
I don't know what happened, if anything, from a pharmacy standpoint regarding this scenario. Do any of you know what the legal implications are for an institution not adequately controlling a controlled substance?
(*) Let's also assume Pyxis had very recently been reprogrammed to allow Pyxis- only access to refrigerated meds.