Hello Jeager! I figure I'll throw my $0.02 here. I have been in the military healthcare system for 11 of my 13 years of nursing - 7 years active duty AF (3 of those years serving at an Army hospital) and 3 years of civil service at Army hospitals. These answers are related to what I feel I can answer to from personal experience. :) Some of these things are hard to answer because a lot of the 'worth' of military vs. civilian nursing is based on personal issues. Yes, the financials come into play but each individual rates the importance of home/family life, individual freedoms, etc. Often you're not really going to know until you're in the situation, I think. In the military there are leadership courses you go to (Head Nurse course (Army), Nursing Services Management (AF)) which help add to the leadership you've already learned in your BSN program. I have known several people in the military who were nurse managers of a clinic/unit after only a few years of experience. While I was made a charge nurse in about 6 months during my stint in a civilian hospital I think part of that were the circumstances on my unit as well as the fact that I had considerable charge experience in other facilities already. I don't believe it's common to find such young (experience wise) nurses in management in the civ world. With that being said, once you have gone into that track it is harder to get out in subsequent assignments unless you are going to a very large facility and want to do floor work, or are going to advanced practice. I have found a significantly higher level of professionalism on the military side. As with any place there are going to be individuals who don't seem to have a professional bone in their body but in the whole there has been no comparison in my military/civilian experiences. Nurses are a vital part of the health care team in either setting, and your personal experience credit is given its due as well. In the military you hold 2 professions - first and foremost you are a military officer which has its own accord of duty and professionalism. On top of that you have the professionalism of your clinical career. This is always a possibility. The needs of the military are the priority over your personal desires. However, they have a vested interest in meshing their needs with people's wants. This is where it is important to be honest and direct about your professional goals so they can hopefully mesh. The other important part is to realize that there are few 'wasted' opportunities. When I was first in the service I was frustrated that I was moved around so much (within the facility, not around the world). After I had a little perspective I was very thankful for the varied experiences I had. It has made me a far better nurse to have the 'breadth and depth' I have. That being said, if you are tagged with a specialty identifier (L&D, ICU, ER, etc.) there is a much better chance that you can remain in that lane of practice...actually it can be difficult sometimes to break out if you decide you want to do something totally different! However, if CRNA is your goal then being 'stuck' in critical care would be to your benefit. I have no answer for this one... This is really one of those personality questions. Obviously there are monetary rewards. You will gain experience on a deployment that you can't get anywhere else, even if you were in a large urban trauma center. However, there are many deployments you can go on which won't see 'action'. If you go somewhere like Qatar or Diego Garcia it will be like a rather short vacation with clinic hours. If you get deployed to Germany for a year that will be a long vacation. If you deploy for a year with a Combat Support Hospital to a hot spot...well that will be totally different. How it balances out will be a truly personal choice. Is the money, clinical experience, importance of your work and camaraderie worth the lost time with your family, the long hours, sometimes spartan quarters and the forever memory of what you've seen? No one is going to be able to tell you that except yourself. When you take into account base pay, housing, insurance, etc. there is little comparison to the civilian world after the first few years. I started out making a bit less than my civ. counterparts when I was a 2Lt, but once you've been in for a short while the pay and benefits far outstrips the pay you'd receive in the civilian world as a staff nurse. I can't speak much for CRNAs or providers although I know several of my docs took home less money after they got out because of the unknown costs of working private practice, paying for malpractice insurance, paying for health insurance, etc. Each place is individual, and you're a salaried employee. There were times when I had a cush job with fewer hours and got paid to go to lunch and the gym. There were other times when I worked almost 60 hour weeks because things went to crap downrange and our patient census tripled in 24 hours. I would say there's no comparison. Yes, you move but I don't think it's like travel nursing at all. There you can pick and choose assignments, they can be a few weeks or extended up to a year. In the military you can move, yes, but you will be there for 3-5 years at a time unless it's a short remote assignment to Korea, Turkey, etc. You can move within a facility though; that's not to say you have to work in the same unit for all of those years. Medics are the health care workers that really take the brunt of danger in the military. As a nurse you're much more removed most of the time. I would say, given the length of deployment and the areas of deployment, that the Army will always be the more dangerous of the two when it comes to deployment. I'm not sure what kind of experience you're talking about, so I'm not sure how to answer this. As an Armyfied Air Force nurse I worked in 5 different specialties in 7 years (L&D, Family Practice, Med/Surg, Ortho trauma and nurse manager of an Ortho Clinic). I know several nurses in both branches that have also experienced that variety. However, I've also known many nurses that have pretty much stayed in one lane of experience for many years. It kind of depends what you want, and what they have to offer. While I think the AF has improved since I have been in, you will still promote faster in the Army and they promote more of O4 and above. I have seen similar levels of clinical professionalism. I think the Army has a higher level of military professionalism in the medical setting, if that makes sense. While the medical field is lax compared to line units in both the Army and AF, there is a stricter sense of military bearing in Army hospitals. I think on-base life in the Army has improved a lot over the past decade or so but in general the housing and accommodations on base will be nicer on AF bases. While you can volunteer for a year-long deployment in the AF, most are still 4 or 6 months while the Army typically deploys for a year at a time. I haven't heard of any of my friends/coworkers in the Army deploying anywhere but Iraq or Afghanistan in quite some time while the AF still has deployment locations in Kuwait, Qatar, Kyrgyzstan, etc. I don't know the numbers, although I know they fluctuate depending on the needs of the AF/Army. Each one has CRNA programs (I think they both still have to go through USUHS). Each has tuition assistance if you want to continue schooling while on active duty. Both have programs where your active duty job is to be a graduate student at a civilian university and you continue to get your rank pay while they pay for all your school expenses. Both branches offer many amazing programs, but I have no clue on percentages of availability. Things may be changing now with the trend toward combining health care facilities, but I believe the Army still has more facilities overall where you can get the critical care experience necessary to do the CRNA program. Not that I can think of right now. Work out a lot! :) I'm not sure how far along you are in your studies. You can cram the ROTC program in in a couple of years provided you can handle the increased credit hours on top of nursing school. I personally think ROTC is better than doing a direct commission because I feel it gives you a much better understanding of what it's going to mean to be a military nurse, especially if you didn't grow up with the experience of living in a military household or something similar. You come out with an understanding of some military history, dress & ceremonies, military rating, etc. You'll understand more why being a military nurse entails some of the things it does and the training it does. While ROTC isn't a guarantee of commissioning (I have known people who were released from their contract after 4 years of the ROTC program rather than being commissioned) I think it offers a better chance. With the current financial situation in our country more and more people are turning to the military as an option so it has become much more difficult to get in than it used to be. Since a BSN is the base requirement for any of the Nurse Corps I don't imagine that will give you any special leverage in either situation. As far as I know those are your only 2 options when it comes to nursing - either direct commission after at least 12 months of experience or ROTC...unless you're prior service and can go the OTC/OCS route, which it doesn't sound like you are. :)I don't know if this blathering on has helped you, but I hope there's something useful in there!