Well, we all know how frustrating triage can be. In fact, I try my hardest to never be up there because it stresses me out having people in the waiting room for hours with chest pain. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to have someone with chest pain in the waiting for for 4 hours then bring them to a room and put them on a heart monitor. Okay, anyhow, what are any new ideas out there today to improve the triage process? I was a traveling nurse briefly and saw a few different ways triage functioned. My current job has a process where patients get in a line and there is a "first nurse" that lays eyes on everyone and can decide if someone needs seen immediately. The patient will then sit and get vital signs and wait in line again to go to one of the two triage windows. There, the patient will explain their complaints through a window to a triage nurse, receive a wrist band, then get directed to the registration window to update information. During peak hours, nurses or a triage doctor at the window will place protocol orders and the primary nurse will fill out a little ticket with patient information to receive an EKG if they complained of "chest pain". Of course, however, if a patient is diaphoretic with crushing chest pain, we do the EKG immediately. Our EKG times are still really terrible for STEMIs and it is just frustrating because it shouldn't be that way. Another pet peeve I have about this place is nurses will allow their patients to wait in their rooms after being discharged if they are waiting for a ride and received a narcotic. I feel like other places have a designated discharge area for patients with that issue. I am trying to throw out ideas to management because I am frustrated with the flow of the department.
Thanks all!
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Well, we all know how frustrating triage can be. In fact, I try my hardest to never be up there because it stresses me out having people in the waiting room for hours with chest pain. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to have someone with chest pain in the waiting for for 4 hours then bring them to a room and put them on a heart monitor. Okay, anyhow, what are any new ideas out there today to improve the triage process? I was a traveling nurse briefly and saw a few different ways triage functioned. My current job has a process where patients get in a line and there is a "first nurse" that lays eyes on everyone and can decide if someone needs seen immediately. The patient will then sit and get vital signs and wait in line again to go to one of the two triage windows. There, the patient will explain their complaints through a window to a triage nurse, receive a wrist band, then get directed to the registration window to update information. During peak hours, nurses or a triage doctor at the window will place protocol orders and the primary nurse will fill out a little ticket with patient information to receive an EKG if they complained of "chest pain". Of course, however, if a patient is diaphoretic with crushing chest pain, we do the EKG immediately. Our EKG times are still really terrible for STEMIs and it is just frustrating because it shouldn't be that way. Another pet peeve I have about this place is nurses will allow their patients to wait in their rooms after being discharged if they are waiting for a ride and received a narcotic. I feel like other places have a designated discharge area for patients with that issue. I am trying to throw out ideas to management because I am frustrated with the flow of the department.
Thanks all!