I'm hoping those involved in management can shed some light on a frustration I've had with my hospital's staffing decisions (I know I'm not alone here).
I fully understand and accept that hospitals want to make the biggest profit they can. However, it seems that there is a lot of evidence that lower staffing leads to a number of bad outcomes - most of which cost the hospital money. Falls, med errors, extended LOS, etc. Then of course there is nurse dissatisfaction (higher turnover = more money/time to train, more issues with new nurses), which also affects patient (dis)satisfaction.
In my ICU the charge nurse regularly takes patients. If we have an open charge and one nurse with only one patient, they might be sent home 2 hrs early (additional handoff) and if we admit in that window, someone is tripled or the charge takes the patient. We've had numerous nights where all of the units seem to be scrambling, yet we had nurses on "push-back."
I'm trying to understand more of why this is and what is going into these decisions and how hospital finance works. They're already paying us a huge amount in benefits - why send a nurse home early to save $60 when you have so many potential negative consequences? Do these incidents not harm the hospital financially as much as I think? (I can't imagine - think of the cost of one bad fall!) Is staffing only operating to demonstrate concrete, clear savings (nurse hours), while ignoring the much larger effects of low staffing? What's going on?
Thanks!
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Hello all,
I'm hoping those involved in management can shed some light on a frustration I've had with my hospital's staffing decisions (I know I'm not alone here).
I fully understand and accept that hospitals want to make the biggest profit they can. However, it seems that there is a lot of evidence that lower staffing leads to a number of bad outcomes - most of which cost the hospital money. Falls, med errors, extended LOS, etc. Then of course there is nurse dissatisfaction (higher turnover = more money/time to train, more issues with new nurses), which also affects patient (dis)satisfaction.
In my ICU the charge nurse regularly takes patients. If we have an open charge and one nurse with only one patient, they might be sent home 2 hrs early (additional handoff) and if we admit in that window, someone is tripled or the charge takes the patient. We've had numerous nights where all of the units seem to be scrambling, yet we had nurses on "push-back."
I'm trying to understand more of why this is and what is going into these decisions and how hospital finance works. They're already paying us a huge amount in benefits - why send a nurse home early to save $60 when you have so many potential negative consequences? Do these incidents not harm the hospital financially as much as I think? (I can't imagine - think of the cost of one bad fall!) Is staffing only operating to demonstrate concrete, clear savings (nurse hours), while ignoring the much larger effects of low staffing? What's going on?
Thanks!