isis17

I honestly think that the 5 year BSN is a scam. Seriously 4 years is enough to establish competence of RNs and that relies heavily on the quality of training. Quality training revolving around the Clinical instructors, the facilities, the clinical exposure. I think that what needs to be done is the abolishment of the ASHE curriculum. It is seriously not needed. 2 years should not be spent on concepts of community nursing (although I do like community nursing), a few months is enough. Time should be allotted to all the nursing disciplines. I also prefer the old curriculum where fresh meat was thrown early in for clinical exposure. Frankly nursing is 70% skill and 30% knowledge. Good nurses can be harvested if they are allowed more time with clinical exposure.

hi, there has been a fuss lately about a program other than nvq for those who want to apply for student visa in the uk... your units as an rn are credited. i've attended one of their seminars recently and it really seems too good to be true. the only catch is the price php 500,000.00 bsc hons (health and social care) is said to compliment your nursing course. you study bsc hons and are able to work for 40 hours without restrictions on overtime. it happens because your work becomes a requirement for your course. you work as a caregiver and not a nurse for the course of 2 years. i'd like to ask for your advice regarding this. thanks name of program edited as well as other name that was posted per the tos of this site. suzanne4

HMMM...I recently joined IV Training and instructors said that the ANSAP is making moves to limit IV seminars and training to institutions who have IV (IV instructors) preceptors and have passed ANSAP Hospital screening. After submission of cases and paying 300PHP you get your license. Its a separate license renewable every 3 years.I wonder if in MAkati MED you also get a license when you train there?

Hi Does ANYBODY know the breakdown of the CETN? Why does it cost so much?

hello need your help 3 moths to 3 years was the span of time given as criteria in selecting a set of respondents..do you know of any magazine, article, or anything at all that might back-up or explain why this is ideally choosen this criteria was recommended by a research adviser and were all newbies we don't know why? this aspect really needs to be defended and so far were all left with assumptions and the research would be more credible if we could back it up with a study, research or anything at all please please we really need to defend this... so any links or replies would really be appreciated ... :uhoh21: our study is about the lived experiences of nurses in a psychiatric unit...phenomenological qualitative research