PRIORITY diagnosis
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
Our weekly care plans ask for our top three nursing diagnoses. Out of the three, we are asked to choose the PRIORITY dx (and give a care plan for it), and to provide a rationale for why this particular dx is our top choice.
I can come up with loads of dxs for my patients. So I usually think to myself: what could kill this person now, this shift, or soon? If one of them fits the bill, that's my priority. I go down the ABC's, and if they are all good, up Maslow's hierarchy. Easy.
If nothing will kill them soon, then I get fuzzy. And sort of look at all my dx's and let the one that "seems" most urgent grab me. Maybe I'm even letting which one is the easiest or quickest to fix grab me. I'm not sure.
I'm flummoxed when it comes to writing the rationale for my choice. Since I choose the "it'll kill you quicker" ones by a process of elimination, my rationale doesn't sound like a "rationale."
In my head, my rationale sounds like this: "No airway problem, breathing...breathing problem -- stop -- priority dx," or "No airway, breathing, circulation problems, moving on to Maslow, physiologic needs...fluid problem -- stop -- priority dx."
For the "it won't kill you any time soon, but it certainly sucks" ones, I really don't know how to justify my choice. "This one's easy/quick to fix so let's just knock it off your long list of sucky things," or "This one's not so sucky now, but let's begin to tackle it so it doesn't turn into an 'it'll kill you' one."
I like to keep things simple, but I'm feeling like maybe I need more ways to look at, and more clarity, on WHY or HOW I choose the priority dx.
I don't know how to phrase my question here anymore precisely, than to say: I feel like something's missing.
Maybe I'm looking at this whole thing the wrong way. I feel like I'm looking at the negative side, i.e., imagining the worst-case scenario for my patient and trying to avoid that. Should I be imagining their best-case scenario, their "ultimate" goal, would that help?
I wonder if my fear about missing something important (as an inexperienced nursing student) is skewing or narrowing my view, and if I should begin to incorporate another, broader, perspective on care.
Right now, I could sure use a better rationale than, "well, er, um, everything else that's more important is O.K., and everything else that's less important is, um...less important?"
Any thoughts would be most welcome.