The med/surg unit I work on, which receives a majority of neuro and ortho post-ops, recently transitioned into using [continuous] end-tidal CO2 monitoring & [continuous] pulse ox monitoring on patients who have a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump running.
Prior to this, we just did [continuous] pulse-ox monitoring. Both types of monitoring are only "in place" when the patient is in bed - i.e. we unhook them when they're in the bathroom, out with therapy, etc. (So, not 100% continuous, but they are monitored most all of the time.)
Both the pulse ox and the ETCO2 monitoring are hooked up/linked into the vitals monitoring (we have MindRay) and this system doesn't cross over to the actual IV/PCA pump - so if the Pt is a mouth breather, for example, and the monitor reads "zero" the PCA keeps running. I've learned from nurses at other local hospitals that their monitors are somehow tied into their IV pumps and the IV "brains" will pause or shut off if readings are outside of set parameters. Our system doesn't do this. We have a "duck bill" nasal cannula apparatus available that is supposed to catch CO2 from mouth breathers but I've had little success with it the times I've implemented it.
Anyways. I'm just curious. Is my hospital way behind the times in implementing this kind of monitoring? What is your experience? Is your monitoring 100% continuous? Just when the patient is in bed?
I'm mainly wondering about other med/surg units but would welcome a response from anyone with any experience here. Many of the patients become annoyed with the additional cords and the monitor beeping, etc, (which is life - it's a hospital, not a hotel) but it's a change from how we used to do things.
Thanks for feeding my curiosity!
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
The med/surg unit I work on, which receives a majority of neuro and ortho post-ops, recently transitioned into using [continuous] end-tidal CO2 monitoring & [continuous] pulse ox monitoring on patients who have a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump running.
Prior to this, we just did [continuous] pulse-ox monitoring. Both types of monitoring are only "in place" when the patient is in bed - i.e. we unhook them when they're in the bathroom, out with therapy, etc. (So, not 100% continuous, but they are monitored most all of the time.)
Both the pulse ox and the ETCO2 monitoring are hooked up/linked into the vitals monitoring (we have MindRay) and this system doesn't cross over to the actual IV/PCA pump - so if the Pt is a mouth breather, for example, and the monitor reads "zero" the PCA keeps running. I've learned from nurses at other local hospitals that their monitors are somehow tied into their IV pumps and the IV "brains" will pause or shut off if readings are outside of set parameters. Our system doesn't do this. We have a "duck bill" nasal cannula apparatus available that is supposed to catch CO2 from mouth breathers but I've had little success with it the times I've implemented it.
Anyways. I'm just curious. Is my hospital way behind the times in implementing this kind of monitoring? What is your experience? Is your monitoring 100% continuous? Just when the patient is in bed?
I'm mainly wondering about other med/surg units but would welcome a response from anyone with any experience here. Many of the patients become annoyed with the additional cords and the monitor beeping, etc, (which is life - it's a hospital, not a hotel) but it's a change from how we used to do things.
Thanks for feeding my curiosity!