A friend of mine who works LTC texted me today when she discovered that a PEG tube had blown out while she was attempting to clear a plug in the tube. I'm not sure exactly what she did wrong, if she even did anything wrong, to blow the tube out. In any case, she told me that there was a large hole about 1 inch down from the access port and she asked me what my recommendation was.
I told her that the tube needs to either be replaced by an RN who is trained to replace PEGs or that the patient needs to be sent out for a replacement.
She called the FNP on-call, and the FNP told her to just cut below the hole, remove the access port from the damaged part of the tube, and place the access port back on the now-shorter tube.
What do you guys think? Are you comfortable doing that type of procedure - jury-rigging a medical device - or would you insist that the PEG is replaced? My chief concern would be that the PEG is possibly damaged at a secondary location in the perioneum that is not immediately visible, because something is clearly wrong with the PEG in that it failed by blowing out.
Is it overly-cautious to insist that the PEG be replaced, or is it acceptable to modify the device in the way that the FNP advised?
A friend of mine who works LTC texted me today when she discovered that a PEG tube had blown out while she was attempting to clear a plug in the tube. I'm not sure exactly what she did wrong, if she even did anything wrong, to blow the tube out. In any case, she told me that there was a large hole about 1 inch down from the access port and she asked me what my recommendation was.
I told her that the tube needs to either be replaced by an RN who is trained to replace PEGs or that the patient needs to be sent out for a replacement.
She called the FNP on-call, and the FNP told her to just cut below the hole, remove the access port from the damaged part of the tube, and place the access port back on the now-shorter tube.
What do you guys think? Are you comfortable doing that type of procedure - jury-rigging a medical device - or would you insist that the PEG is replaced? My chief concern would be that the PEG is possibly damaged at a secondary location in the perioneum that is not immediately visible, because something is clearly wrong with the PEG in that it failed by blowing out.
Is it overly-cautious to insist that the PEG be replaced, or is it acceptable to modify the device in the way that the FNP advised?