STUDENT HERE: I have noticed many different methods of this and have a few things I hope someone can clarify. A Chemotherapy Pt. is there for infusion. hydration is ordered some pre and some post so a 1000ml Nss running in 500/hr Iv running into central line . As the premeds come they PB them and lower the saline so they run in over 30min. and then just let those gravity in by lifting the line, and restarting the flush ( at 60 not 550) . Then the Abraxane comes(nab-paclitaxel).... its only a 33ml bag so again they lower the saline. AND this 33ml is supposed to run in over 30 min. and the pump was set at 66ml/hr...... well after about 15min the entire bags worth of med is in the tubing/ none left in the hanging bag and its going nowhere. So then you'd have to get the rest from the tubing and into the PT. SO I assumed after watching the first time that you do this by lifting the tubing and use gravity ( holding the line up so it all fills into the pump and into tubing past the pump?? then re start the NSS at the same rate ( 66ml /hr ) until whats basically HALF the DOSE ( like 15ml in tubing right??) goes in at the correct rate ?? and then after its in then back to 550 .. i saw that LAST TIME ... BUT this time I saw different nurse lift the tubing and get all the medication where it needs to be in the tubing .. then start the NSS back up at 550ml/hr..... so the 15ml or more of medication thats supposed to go in slowly over the rest of the 30 min went jamming down the line like a freight train and was in the PT in less than 1 min. IS THIS OK ?? or AM I totally misinterpreting??? they always stress the timing and this particular nurse seemed to be in a a big hurry and had lots of pumps beeping for her and it almost seemed like it was done to save the 15 min wait for the rest going in then having to come back and reset the pump ??? ( oh and How many ml's is in the standard length of IV from pump to patient looked like 4 feet or more ) THANK you for any help.... I was only allowed to observe this time.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
STUDENT HERE: I have noticed many different methods of this and have a few things I hope someone can clarify. A Chemotherapy Pt. is there for infusion. hydration is ordered some pre and some post so a 1000ml Nss running in 500/hr Iv running into central line . As the premeds come they PB them and lower the saline so they run in over 30min. and then just let those gravity in by lifting the line, and restarting the flush ( at 60 not 550) . Then the Abraxane comes(nab-paclitaxel).... its only a 33ml bag so again they lower the saline. AND this 33ml is supposed to run in over 30 min. and the pump was set at 66ml/hr...... well after about 15min the entire bags worth of med is in the tubing/ none left in the hanging bag and its going nowhere. So then you'd have to get the rest from the tubing and into the PT. SO I assumed after watching the first time that you do this by lifting the tubing and use gravity ( holding the line up so it all fills into the pump and into tubing past the pump?? then re start the NSS at the same rate ( 66ml /hr ) until whats basically HALF the DOSE ( like 15ml in tubing right??) goes in at the correct rate ?? and then after its in then back to 550 .. i saw that LAST TIME ... BUT this time I saw different nurse lift the tubing and get all the medication where it needs to be in the tubing .. then start the NSS back up at 550ml/hr..... so the 15ml or more of medication thats supposed to go in slowly over the rest of the 30 min went jamming down the line like a freight train and was in the PT in less than 1 min. IS THIS OK ?? or AM I totally misinterpreting??? they always stress the timing and this particular nurse seemed to be in a a big hurry and had lots of pumps beeping for her and it almost seemed like it was done to save the 15 min wait for the rest going in then having to come back and reset the pump ??? ( oh and How many ml's is in the standard length of IV from pump to patient looked like 4 feet or more ) THANK you for any help.... I was only allowed to observe this time.