I have been an Animal Health Technician (Canadian for "Veterinarian Technician") for many years, and am also in my 4th year of my Bachelor of Science in (HUMAN!) Nursing, so soon will be an RN as well. I believe in England "techs" are called Registered Veterinary Nurses or Registered Veterinary Technicians. Many times technician and nurse have been interchanged, and I don't have a problem with this as long as the word "animal" or "veterinary" is in there somewhere. This tecnician should NOT have called herself an RN in my opinion. In fact, I have been called an "animal nurse" many times and I do not believe that this warrants correcting, but "animal RN" if not acceptable. There is a difference. This is obviously a very controversial subject, and I like to believe it is a matter of professionalism. I would like to think that Veterinary Technicians (being a fairly young orgainzied profession) would want to pave their own path, so to speak, and not be grouped under the umbrella of human nurses. While veterinary technicians Are "animals nurses" in terms of care giving, performing similar skills, and following the "dr.'s" orders (doctors of veterinary medicine), they also, however, do a VERY different job in a number of respects. Not only do they work on a variety of species, as already mentioned (I have worked on dogs, cats, horses, sheep, cattle, reptiles, birds, llamas, moose, deer, tigers, lions, bears, chimpanzees, sturgeon.....the list goes on & on), but they are pretty much the ONLY support staff in a veterinary hospital. Their jobs are very diverse compared to RNs, who tend to specialize. For example, in a day at the veterinary clinic, I will induce and monitor anaesthetic, perform small surgeries such as cat neuters and minor wound/abcess repair (closing wounds, placing drains, etc). I will make a cast, I will take countless radiographs, initiate IVs (and I'm proud to say that if you can hit a vien on a deyhdrated kitten or hampster, you can do it on almost any human around!!!). I also do dentistry (scaling and polishing teeth, doing root canals, extracting teeth), exams, perform and analyse laboratory tests....the list goes on and on! And I'm the cleaner, the surgical suite organizer, kennel girl, orderer of supplies, housekeeping, dietary....all thsoe things! SO, as you can see, it's a demanding profession with a solid knowledge base, and I'm proud to be a technician, and tell the world. I don't lump it behind human nursing because it is that AND so much more. I also recognise the need to specialize, and will do so as an RN. I am proud to be an RN too! I wonder if the initial poster's experience with the veterinary technician could have reflected a bit of insecurity or respect-seeking on the part of the technician? Perhaps she knew her client was an RN, and wanted to ensure that the client knew she had the proper training to care for the client's dog? I know that in MANY of the veterinary clinics I have worked in, there is a type of coding on files of animals belonging to RNs. This alerts the veterinary staff that the pet is owned by an RN. This is because there seems to be a history of friction between people in the medical profession for animals, or those for humans. Or at least a feeling of needing to be "on your toes" because some RNs will really challenge your knowledge. Unfortunately, I HAVE heard of a veterinary technician giving out advice to humans (and trust me, humans DO seek medical advice from veterinary staff regularily!). It happens on occasion when people are not cognizant of their professional roles, liability, etc. Dishing out medical advice when you are not an RN is bad, but not not as bad as this: I have seen many RNs try and treat their pets by themselves. Like, for example, the RN who knew cat's urethra was blocked and decided she could unblock it herself with just some xylocaine jelly and a small catheter. OR the RN who thought that her dog had a splinter in his member (not knowing that there is actually a bone in there), and decided to try and dig it out on her own. Neither of these pets were given anesthetic for these "treatments", and both ended with tragic results. I believe this is cruelty. Or RNs who want to save costs by doing injections on their pets at home-fair enough, but can they landmark properly? I had an RN kill her own horse by accidentally injecting penicillin into a vien, where it entered the horse's CNS. The horse had a reaction to this, and began rearing and one of his forelegs struck the RN in the head, killing her. So now both the horse and the woman are dead, and the veterinarian feels ultimately responsible. A technician can do damage to a person seeking medical advice only if that person follows the advice. But many times animals are restrained for proceedures and do not have a choice in the matter. To me, *SOME* RNs seem quick say that they are competent in veterinary medicine as well...I am sure some of you have used your medical knowledge to give advice on someone's pet. Now, I know the above are rather extreme examples, and do not happen all the time. But they are out there, and these are the reasons that such limitations need to me made clear: a veterinary technician IS registered as a nurse or technician, but for ANIMALS, and this should be stated every time. And an RN may have an excellent knowledge base, but needs to respect that there are differences in treating animals vs. people. Anyways, as you can see there is a difference between the two. Not everyone here is going to agree with me, and that's fine. I have the unique role of straddling both professions and being able to see the differences between the two on a regular basis. So I just thought I'd share some thoughts with you. :) Jackie