Thank you bu for your insightful, well thoughout answer. It is fascinating to hear an alternative view of a nationalized health care system. When I am faced with this question I have a difficult time being all for one or the other. I believe health care is not a commodity such as food and housing. It is easier to budget for food and housing, one has a general idea of what it will cost you at any given time. However, health care under the current system in the US is not something you can budget for. One can live and choose to do all the right things, but can not change their genetics. (And one can choose to spend every waking moment at Dunkin Donuts-because they taste good) However, catastrophic illness can strike at anytime. If your insurance plan only covers 80%, you are still responisble for 20%, which can cause financial ruin with one hospitalization. In the past, one could be uninsurable if they had pre-existing conditions. Back to right or priviledge- I would like to believe that everyone has the right to a minimum amount of care, but who decides what is a minimum, I do not have the answer for that. In this age of the shrinking health care dollar difficult decisions are going to have to be made. Should the US move towards "universal health care" and if so how do we pay for it. As an interesting side note the World Health Organization reported that the US spends a higher portion of its gross domestic product on health care but ranks 37 out 191 countries studied (There has been quite abit of negative press written about the actual ranking system) But, the fact remains that the US does spend more and the outcomes are not always better than other countries that spend less. So, maybe the argument should be less about right or privledge and more about how to provide quality cost effective care that is affordable for all (including the government).......lets hear it for Nurse Managed Healthcare Centers. (And no I am not an NP, nor am I planning on that educational pathway)