MTM

Sounds like your right, although is looks like the CVP insertion could be simulated and S.G. insertion optional...Maybe I did get some misinformation from the student I spoke with. She didn't mention anything about a-line insertion, but it sounds like it is a requirement. This just sort of shows how CRNA programs can differ b/c of what's "required" and what's "preferred." I'm going to look for a program that meets or exceeds the AANA's requirements and preferences. Does anyone know of programs that meet or exceed AANA preferences?

I totally agree with your opinions. I just don't understand why some schools don't prepare their students to practice anesthesia to their fullest capacity. Any thoughts? The school I was considering is very affordable, but now I must weigh this with the limited training I would receive. A large part of what interests me in anesthesia is the autonomy. I don't just want to do simple cases on healthy patients all the time. I would not be satisfied with a career like this, even if the money was good. I want to be valued and respected for my ability and knowledge, something which is lacking in my role as an RN.

From your responses it sounds like you prefer full scope practice to a limited practice. Why do you prefer this? If I graduate from CRNA school without having learned the full scope of practice, would I be considered a less capable CRNA? It seems to me that I would. If during a case, a swan is required to better manage the patient, I would like to do that instead of having to step aside and have the MDA do it. Is that your opinion too?

I am looking into a anesthesia school that does not provide students with opportunities to put in invasive lines i.e. central lines, a-lines, swans. Is this a disadvantage or is it not that important? I know that other programs do provide these opportunities. As a CRNA, are you expected to be able to do this? If you don't learn it in school can you be taught on the job? thanks