The Reason Why I Ask Is, Nothing In This World Man-made Is 100%. Everything Has A Flaw. You Always Hear About How Precise The Scoring Of The Nclex Exam Is And How It Determines Your Pass/fail Result With 95% Certainty. Are There People Who Really Felt As If They Passed And Wanted To Review Or Have Someone Review Their Results? If Reviewed, Was It Discovered That Indeed They Should Have Passed? Why Is It That The Diagnostic Profile Is So Vague? It Only Tells You The Area Of Deficiency. What Bothers Me About That Is Given What The Question May Be, You Get It Wrong, But If You Answered Another Question Or Have Taken Practice Questions That Relate To That Same Category Of Questions And You Have Been Successful In That Area, Does That Mean You Are Really Deficient. The Dagnostic Profile Should Be More Specific Of What Your Weakness Really Is On The Exam. It's Not As If They Are Giving You The Question You In Which It Pertains To. Anyway, That's Something I Have Always Wondered. I'm Also Bored At Work. I Work Nightshift And It's Kind Of Slow.