I’m an RN in an SNF setting.
A nurse aide had reported to me that a patient’s toe was gradually becoming purple over the past three days. On assessment I noticed the patient obviously had some degree of arterial disease and got MD orders for arterial US. On the next shift the LVNs ended up getting a transfer to hospital order by speaking to the MD again and saying the the patient was getting worse. Based on the pictures they took, the patient remained unchanged and they likely confused long standing hemosiderin staining with the new arterial discoloration based on my conversation with them. The MD likely ordered the transfer because they told him that the peripheral pulse was getting weaker, which I doubt. Like I said, it seemed to me that they actually didn’t know what hemosiderin staining was and thought the díscoloration was spreading when their pictures were no different than the ones I took and shared with the MD.
Now, I disagreed with their judgment and they blamed me for documenting that the aide had said the change was gradual in onset because that might be a liability issue. However I see no issue with writing that because the aide is unlicensed and has no nursing/medical judgment and this provides some info about the onset of the current problem. Am I wrong about this? Also, the arterial US did come back indicating moderate arterial disease without an acute issue. I’m guessing the LVNs are worried about their own liability for the past several days since they do direct patient care. However the aide hadn’t reported anything until they thought the issue was abnormal because the onset was gradual. My main question is, is my documentation in this case really a problem? Or my view that CNAs have a lower standard of judgment because they’re unlicensed and therefore don’t have special professional judgment other than common sense?