How to Evaluate the 250 hr Work Reqmnt
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
Hi there,
I'm currently finishing up my 3rd quarter LPN clinicals. The school I attend has a mandatory/optional requirement between the LPN & RN levels. If you have failed any technical courses, by the end of the LPN program, you are required to work 500 hrs before starting the RN level. If you have not had to retake any technical courses, you have the option of going straight through to the RN program, working 250 hrs, or taking a 2-cr preceptorship program to get clinical experience in lieu of the 250 hr work requirement. Typically, only the top 10-20 students are allowed to go straight through to the RN program while the rest of the class has to either work or precept a minimum of 250 hrs.
I'm trying to evaluate the actual benefit of working 250 hrs prior to the RN level. Many students in my class are opting to work or precept even if they will be allowed to go straight through - because they feel the experience will be "critical" to their success.
In all liklihood, if my grades continue as they are, I will have the option to either go straight through or opt to do the 250 hrs through either paid work or preceptorship (instead of being told I have to do the hrs). However, I don't know how to evaluate how working 6-8 weeks prior to entering Level II will be more, less, or have no impact on my RN program.
Has anyone had any experience with a program like this?
Thanks!
Julie